Добавил:

ivanov666 Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.

Вуз:

Мурманский арктический государственный университет

Предмет:

[НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]

Файл:

VUzxCLyIhH.pdf

Скачиваний:

Добавлен:

15.04.2023

Размер:

1.86 Mб

Скачать

☆

<<< < Предыдущая 1 23 / 43 4 > Следующая >>>

81.22 /

.А.

. ,

А.

			.
.	:	,	,
	:	,	,
,	,		.

T.A. Rychkova

Murmansk state humanities university

Murmansk, Russia

THE INFLUENCE OF THE HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL SITUATION ON THE DYNAMICS OF THE CULTURAL CONNOTATIONS OF PHRASES

Abstract. The article discusses the cultural connotation and its relationship with cultural associations and stereotypes. The dynamics of cultural connotations due to cultural and historical change in society.

Key words: cultural connotation, word-combinations, naming ritual actions, dynamics, cultural and historical changes.

,	,
,	.	-
	.
(	,
(
)	(
,	)	.

( .,

109

						,
		.		1).		,
		.
					,
(		,	. .),
		.
		,					,
		.
		,		-
	I .	(	)
	I .			«			»
				«		-	»
					«	».
«	»	«			»,
	«	»	«
		» Д	(«	: 884Ж.	»)	,
			(«		»)
(«			»),	,
	.			,
	.	:		;
	.	:	-	;
	;			;		,	,
				;			;
		,	,		,		;
	,	,	,		,		,
	,		,				,
			,

Д	Ж.					,
		-	,			,
			,
	«		»,	«
	».	,				-
						,

1
	,		(	,	,	),
(	-	)			(	).
. .	,
–	,	Д	2004: 38Ж.		,
–		Д	2004: 38Ж.

110

	:	,		,		.
					.			,
				,	-	,
				,			–
	.						–
	.
	,							,
	:
	.
	,			.	.,
				.	.,
Д	: . I,	389Ж.	«		,			»
Д	: . I,	389Ж.			,
	,				,
	,	.		,
	,	.	-	,	,
	,				,
		(		)	.	-	,
	(						:
	(
,	)1,
	.							,
			,		,			,
	.	-		,
. .	,			XIX .
	,			.
.	:	,		.			,
.	:	,					,
	.						,	-
	.
	.							,
	: «			,		!» [	].
							. .
1
«	» (1918).
«	» (1918).
			111

	,					,
			,			,
	,		,			,
			,
«			», «
», «		».	.
			.
		«	»,	«		»,
				.
.	: ( )			, –	,	–
,			(	); ( )		,
						,
		Д	Ж.
	,	,			,
	,	«		…	,	,
		«		…		,
	»		( )	«
»	(	).
	).	(
	).
	,			,	-
			-			,
,			,	-
,	«			»,
		[	].			,
	,					,
	,			,
	«		», «	,	»	( ),
	«		», «		»	( ),
«	»	(	).			,
						,
	.	.,			-
(	.	.,
(
«	»		)

(

)

(

112

.	: ( )	,		,
		,
	(	); ( )
	,			,
	,			,
,	Д	Ж.		,
,	Д	Ж.
/		,
/	»)	(«		», «
	»)	,
		,
		.
	,	,
	,	.
		.
				,
				.
(	)			,
		,		,
		(	.,	).

1.		.				Д	Ж. –	.:	, 1991 – 330 .
2.	.		,			Д	Ж. –	.:	, 1987. – 448 .
3.	. .								Д	Ж:	4	. –
.:			, 1989–1991. – 2726 .
4.	.			Д	Ж. –	.:		, 1998. – 445 .
5.	.	.,		. .						: 80 000
					Д	Ж /				.
1997. – 944 .			.	. .		. – 4-		.,	. –	.:		,
1997. – 944 .					.							. –
6.	. .				.					:	2	. –
.:	-	;			, 1999. – 2054 .
7.	. . .		.	– .:		Д	Ж: 3 . /		. . .
	. . .		.	– .:
				, 1938.	– 1562 .
8.	. .		Д	Ж. –	.:		, 2009. – 464 .

113

114

316.7:331.1 /

60.56:65.240

. .

. ,

А.

			.
	,		,	,
	,		,	,
			,	.
		:		.
		:	,	,	,
,	,	,		.

L.S. Skripnichenko

Kuban State University

Krasnodar, Russia

THE ROLE OF CORPORATE CULTURE IN HUMAN RESOURCE

MANAGEMENT

Abstract. The article discusses the features of the corporate culture in the management of human resources. Analyzes the components of the corporate culture of the organization, having our own traditions and customs, as well as methods for their preservation and development, values and tools of corporate culture as a tool to improve the management of the modern organization.

Key words: corporate culture, human resources, traditions, customs, values, norms, management of the organization.

	,
,	,
,	.
	:

115

			,
			,		1.	,
					1.
			,			,
	,	,				2.
						,
		,				.
	,	,	,
	,		,
			.			,
		,		,	,	,
		,	.	,	,	,
			.			.
						.
	,				;	,
	;				;	,
	;					,
						3.
			.		.	-
			.		.
160	.		,		70%	, . .
			,		70%	, . .
	;	20%	,			, 10%
	;	20%				, 10%
		.	,
		,

. .,	. .	:
		//
		. – 2013. – № 3 (10). – .
37.	. .
	. .
//	:	-
. – 2014. –	. 128.
	. .
	//	XXI
:	. – 2013. – № 3. –	. 125.

116

		,			.
		(56,6%)			«
	»;	18.3%			,
,	16.6%				; 8.5%
,		,			.
		,				-
13.3%	, 23.3%			,		,
13.3%		(6.6%),		,	(6.6%),
		(6.6%),		.	(6.6%),	3.3%
	(46.9%)	,		.
,	(46.9%)	,		.
,	,			.
	,	(
),		(			,	,
),					,	,
	,				.	, ,
	,				.
	,	.
: 40%		.	,	46.6% –	,	13.4%
: 40%			,	46.6% –	,	13.4%
	.
.			(46.6%)		,	.
		(68%)		,		.
		(68%)		,
		; 3.3%		,
	; 19.3%	,			–
-	, 5.7%	–		, 3.7% «
».				(55.7%)	,
18%		,		,	; 26.3%	;
18%		,			; 26.3%
.	,					,
	,	: 57.2%				,
,	26.4%	: 57.2%	,	11.3%
,	26.4%		,	11.3%
	,
	(5.1%).
	,
	.
,				,		,
				,

117

118

	.		,
	.
(80%)	,
	; 12.4%	,
	; 6.3%		; 1.3%	,
		.	55.7%	,
			, 16.4% –
	»	.	; 27.9%	«
	»	.
			:
	,	,	,
		,			,
	,	,	–		,
	,	,		,	,
	,			,	,
				,	,
			,	,
		,	,
	.	,
	.
	,
	:
	(	,	),		,
			,		,
		.	,
		.
		,		,	,
		,		,	,
		,		.	,
				.
				,
		,			.
					,
				,	,
				,
	,				.
		,
		119

			,
			,
			,
. .
	,
			.
	,		,
			;
		,	;
	,	,	,
			,
			,
			.
1.	. .,	. .
	:		//
2013. – № 3 (10). –		. 36–39.	. –
2013. – № 3 (10). –		. 36–39.
2.	. .	//
		//
XXI	:	. – 2013. – № 3. –	. 124–129.
3.	. .	//	:
		//	:
		. – 2014. – . 127–130.

120

614(470.1/.2) /	51.1(2 ),09			. .
				. .
	–			;
	(		)	. .
				. .
	.	,	; .	,
:
	XX–XXI

А.

			,
	:	«	»
«	».	.	,
	,	.	,
	,
-	,	,	.
	,		.
	:		.
	:	,	,
	,	;	,
	,		.

V.V. Tevlina

University of Tromso – The Arctic University of Norway;

Northern (Arctic) Federal University

named after M.V. Lomonosov

Kirkenes, Norway; Archangelsk, Russia

HELTH AND SOCIAL SUPPORT OF POPULATION

IN NORTHERN RUSSIA: THE STUDY LESSONS OF THE PROBLEM UNDER THE HELP OF FUTURE SPECIALISTS IN SOCIAL WORK ON THE BOUNDARY OF XX–XXI CENTURIES

Abstract. This article shows the importance of analysis the questions of health and social care in a context of their communication among themselves not only as parts of the social policy of different states, but also as a directions of the general interests of two sciences: “public health” and “social work”. The special attention is paid to results of the interrogation of students of social work faculty in Archangelsk showing their attitude to study on a speciality, to questions of public health and to the

121

potential work in one team with professionals from other socially-focused sectors and, first of all, from medicine. Article shows an importance of studying questions of public health by social workers, and using the knowledge received by them for maintenance of social and physical health of inhabitants of the European North of Russia.

Key words: social policy, public health, social help, social work; social education, interdisciplinary approach, inter-branch interaction.

						,
	.		,		,	,	.
			,				.
	,			,	,		,
					,	,	,
					.	,	,
				.	,	,	,
				.	,
				,		.
						.
							,
							,
	.				,
	,				,
	,			,	,	,	-
				,	,	,
					.		,
							,
					,		,
				,	;		,
				,
				1.	,	«	»,
				1946 .
				,	2000 .,
«		,		,	-
				»2.
					:	-
1	.	.,		. .	:	-
1
	. –		:	-	, 1998.

2«Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organisation»

(International Health Conference – New York, 1946); ASPHER (Association of Schools of Public Health in the Eu-

122

			,
			.
	«		«	,	»,
. .	«			,	,
	,				,
	,
	,		,
	»1.
	,	«	»	«
	»		«public health»		«social
medicine»,
	20	.		,	,
	,	,	,
«	»,		«		»
«			».
		,	,		,
			,		,
	,		.
	-
	«			»
	.			1999	.2
	XXI			,
	,				,
	,	,		, . .	,
	,	,
	.	,
	.		,		,
			,		,
			,
	,		,
	.

ropean Region), Professionalisation in public health: Future roles and their implications for training programmes and strategies, Abstracts from conference, 14–17 October, 2000. – Argus, 2000.

1 Winslow C.-E.A. The Untilled Fields of Public Health//Science, 1920, January 9. – № 51 (1306). – P. 23–33.

2		:	/	. .
2
. – .:	-	, 2010. –	1.

123

,		,
	,	,
		.
,	,	,

			,		,
«			»	1991 .					,
									,
			. 2003 .					,
1992 .		,							,
1992 .									,
	,					.		,	1997	.
	1.							,		,
	1.									,
		,	,							,
		,	,				,			2.
		.				,	,
		.				,	,
		.					,
		.						3.
								3.
								(22.5%)
						.		,
			,					,
						,
										:
1		:	. .							:
1
2	,	,	. –		:	-	, 2002.
2	.	: Golden H., Pins A.M., Jones W. Students in Schools of Social Work: A
	.
	study of Characteristics and Factors Affecting Career Choice and Practice Concentration. –
	New York:	Wiley,	1972;			.	«
			//				«
		»,	1996	. –	., 1996;		. .
3							. –	, 1997	.
3	.	: Tevlina V. Recent changes of public health problems in social work studies
	.

on North-АОsЭ RЮssТК. IЧ: PrШМООНТЧР ШП CКХШЭЭ AМКНОЦв 2007 “NОа NШrЭСОrЧ DТЦОnsТШЧ”

(ed. L. Heininen). – Rovaniemi, University of Lapland, 2008. – P. 189–200.

124

					1.					,
			,		,			,		(40
.			)	,				,	, 2000–2003
.				,				,
					,
				.		,
			–	(82.5%),		,			17.5%.
			–	(82.5%),					17.5%.
				20	40	,
31		.	45.0%			,	55.0%
			.		,				«
			»		,
			.		,					75.0%
			.							,
			,	,						,
			,	,
50%				«		«			».
50%					».	«		,	20%
					».			,	20%
			,		«			,
		».	,
		».	, 67.5%
			, 67.5%
				, . .					,
			,	. 17.5%
					,	.			,	17,5%
					,
			.		,	,			(
			) – 10.0%,		,			– 7.5%.
					,
				«			»	«		».
			(15	)				37.5%
				,	,
					,
			,	,	«					»,
					(	)		.	(J.M.	Last):

1	.,		: Siefert K., Jayarathe S. Implementing the Public Health Social Work For-
	.,

ward Plan: A research-based prevention curriculum for schools of social work // Health & Social Work, 1992. – № 17 (1). – P. 17–28; Kovacs P.J., Bronstein L.R. Preparation for oncology settings: what hospice social workers say they need // Health & Social Work, 1999. – № 24 (1). – P. 57–65.

125

«	,			,	–
	,				»1. «
» . .	,			«
,	»2.
,				,
			.	,	,
			.		,
				,	.
.	(A. Coffey		P. Arkinson),		«
				,
				.
	,				»3.
,	. . 35.0%				»3.
,	. . 35.0%
«	»			.	,
,			: «
» (20.0%); «				,	» (20.0%)
					» (20.0%)
«				» (20.0%).	,
,					,
			.		,
	,	:		-	,
,	,			-	4.
,					,
	.				,
37.5%	.
37.5%
,	«			». 7.5%	,
«	,		«		».
	,		«
».			(7	)
,	,		,	: «	»; «
,					»; «

1 Last J.M. Public health and human ecology. – Stamford, Conn: Appleton and Lange, 1998.

3 Coffey A., Arkinson P. Occupational socialization and working lives. – Hants: Overbuy, 1994.

4	. .	-	:	,	,	. –	.:

. 1999.

126

					,		»;
«	»;	«		»;	«		»;
	»;	«					»;
«							»;
«	»; «
	»; «		»; «	-		–
	,		»; «			–
	,				».
		«		»	«		».
	,	,	1/3	,			.
	,	, . .
	,	, . .
	,			,		-
				,
		,		.		,
			,			.	,
				.			,
				.
«	,	», «		»	«		»,
	,
	,					.
		-	,			,	.
			,				.
							,
	,	,	-			.	,
	,	,	,			,
	,	,	,				,
							,
			-	.
				.
			,				.
							.
	,			,			,
	.					1.
				,		1.
				,

1	. ASPHER.	. .	.
	. ASPHER.	. .	.

127

	.		,		. .
(G.A. Kaplan)	.	(A. Ohman)	.		,
,		,	,		,
,		,	,
	,	,	-	,	-
	,	-
		1.

1Kaplan G.A. Economic policy in health policy: Conclusions from the study of income ine-

quality, socioeconomic status and health, Paper presented at income inequality, Socioeconomic Status and Health Conference. – Washington, DC, 2000; Ohman A. Profession on the move. Changing conditions and gendered development in physiotherapy. – Umea, Umea Universitet, 2001.

128

		,			.		, .
(G. Kadushin & M. Egan)		. .		(S.H.Gorin),
,				,
,	1.		,	82.5%			, . .
	1.		,	82.5%			, . .
	,						,
							,
							-
,	.		,				,
,
,				,
	,		,	,
.	,		,
.					,
					,		,
	,						,
	,
.	,	,				-	. .
.	,						. .
. .	(P.J.	Kovacs		L.R.	Bronstein),
	,		.		.	(J. Globerman
M. Bogo),		-			,
,	,			-		2.	,
				,	45.7%
				.	,		,
		.			,		,
					,
«	»	«			».	,	,
	«			»		,	,
	,				.		-
,	,			,			.

1 Kadushin G., Egan M. Educating students for a changing health care environment: An examination of health care practice course content // Health & Social Work, 1997. – № 22 (3). – P. 211–223; Gorin S.H. The crisis of Public Health: implications for social work // Health & Social Work, 2001. – № 26 (1). – P. 49–54.

2Kovacs P.J., Bronstein L.R. Preparation for oncology settings: what hospice social workers say they need // Health & Social Work, 1999. – № 24 (1). – P. 57–65; Globerman J.,

Bogo M. The impact of hospital restructuring on social work field education // Health & Social Work, 2002. – № 27 (1). – P. 7–17.

129

							-
				.		,	,	1/3
				.		,		1/3
	«			»	«	».	,	,
					.		,
		-			.
		,				,		.
	,	,						.
	,				,
		,			,	.
		,	-	,		.
				,				,
					.			,
,					.			.
,	,							.
	,						,	,
							,	,
			,			-
			,	. 37.5%
				. 37.5%		,	,	10%
						,	,	10%
.		,			,	,
.		,			,
	,				,	1990-
						.	,
,					,			.
(82.5%) –					,	,
(82.5%) –						,
				,	,	,
					. 17.5%	7
			.			,	-
,	22.5%	9	.			,
,	22.5%	9
			.	2		,
						,
					.	2	(5.0%)
						-
		.				,
				130

,					,	.
,						.
, 32.5%			.
			.
		,
-		.	-	,
		.		,
		,		«		,
			»			.
		,		,		.
		,		,
,		,				,
		.	,
						.
,
-		2006 .		,	10	,
		2006 .		,	10	,
		.
		.				,
		.			,	-
		.			,
		,
,
.	,	,		,
	,	,
,	,			.
1.	.	:		. –	., 1996.	//
	. .	:		. –	., 1996.
2.	. .
	. –	, 1997.
3.	. .	-	:	,		,

131

	. –	.:	, 1999.
4.	. .				. –	.:	-
	, 2010.
5.	. .,		. .		:	-
	. .	. –	:	-	, 1998.	:	,
6.	. .					:	,
	,	. –	:	-	, 2002.

7.ASPHER. Association of Schools of Public Health in the European Region, Pro-

fessionalisation in public health: Future roles and their implications for training programmes and strategies, Abstracts from conference, 14–17 October, 2000. – Argus, 2000.

8.Coffey A., Arkinson P. Occupational socialization and working lives. – Hants: Overbuy, 1994.

9.Globerman J., Bogo M. The impact of hospital restructuring on social work field education // Health & Social Work, 2002. – № 27 (1). – P. 7–17.

10.Golden H., Pins A.M., Jones W. Students in Schools of Social Work: A study of Characteristics and Factors Affecting Career Choice and Practice Concentration. – New York: Wiley, 1972.

11.Gorin S.H. The crisis of Public Health: implications for social work // Health & Social Work, 2001. – № 26 (1). – P. 49–54.

12.Kadushin G., Egan M. Educating students for a changing health care environment:

An examination of health care practice course content // Health & Social Work, 1997. – № 22 (3). – P. 211–223.

13.Kaplan G.A. Economic policy in health policy: Conclusions from the study of in-

come inequality, socioeconomic status and health, Paper presented at income inequality, Socioeconomic Status and Health Conference. – Washington, DC, 2000.

14.Kovacs P.J., Bronstein L.R. Preparation for oncology settings: what hospice social workers say they need // Health & Social Work. 1999. – № 24 (1). – P. 57–65.

15.Last J.M. Public health and human ecology. – Stamford, Conn: Appleton and Lange, 1998.

16.Ohman A. Profession on the move. Changing conditions and gendered development in physiotherapy. – Umea, Umea Universitet, 2001.

17.Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organisation. International Health Conference. – New York, 1946.

18.Siefert K., Jayarathe S. Implementing the Public Health Social Work Forward Plan:

A research-based prevention curriculum for schools of social work//Health & Social Work, 1992. – № 17 (1). – P. 17–28.

19.Tevlina V. Recent changes of public health problems in social work studies on North-West Russia. In: Proceeding of Calott Academy 2007 “New Northern Dimension” (ed. L. Heininen). – Rovaniemi, University of Lapland, 2008. – Pp. 189–200.

20.Winslow C.-E.A. The Untilled Fields of Public Health // Science, 1920, January 9. – № 51 (1306).

132

316.7 /

60.56.35

V.N. Tereshkina

International institute of business education

Murmansk, Russia

CROSS-CULTURAL INTERPRETING OF SOCIAL HEALTH

IN THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT

Abstract. The understanding of health is historically and socio-cultural limited. Any culture offers something new in human nature and, as a result of that, in the main points of health. Studies addressing these topics need to adopt an interdisciplinary approach.

Key words: health, social health, culture, healthy lifestyle.

Since time immemorial there always have been much discussions about the term “health”. On the one hand, there is uniqueness in the understanding of health; but, on the other hand, we can see some cross-cultural changes and dynamics of health nature through the ages.

Considering health in historical context, some specific trends in its interpretation can be defined. During the Antique science the main principal in the understanding of health was included in combination of physical and spiritual aspects of human being, and they worked necessarily together. The main principal of ancient Eastern philosophy in understanding of health or strong human be-

ing is the unity of the soul and body, mental and physical integrity of the body. The essential part ШП ЭСО CШЧПЮМТЮs’ (551–479 B.C.)1 philosophy is a human

ЛОТЧР, аСКЭ МКЧ’Э ЛО МШЧsТНОrОН ТЧ ТЧsШХКЭТШЧ ШП СОКХЭС ТssЮОs. IЧ МОrЭКТЧ ЭСОШrв harmony is regarded as the major part of human nature. Harmonious man, living in harmony with oneself and the world, first of all, is strong and whole one.

The classical Greek philosophy traditionally starts from the name of Socrates (about 469 B.C. – 399 B.C.). His well-known quotation about health is the

following: “Health is not everything, but everything without health is nothing”.

SШМrКЭОs’ ЩЮЩТХ КЧН ЭСО sЮММОssШr ШП ЭСО ТНОКs – Plato (427 B.C. – 347 B.C.) understands the nature of a man is doubly: as an immortal soul and a mortal body. The idea of health as a harmony of a soul and a body was continued to be.

The synonym of the term “health” Plato named the term “beauty”, because the last one is considered in the same way – as the harmony of soul and body.

There was only one way to be healthy – to balance physical and mental activities. ArТsЭШЭХО’s ЭСШЮРСЭs (384 B.C. – 322 B.C.) logically summed up all the

progress in the health Science. Studying a human being and continuing the issue about the unity of a body and a soul, he developed the idea of the harmony,

1Confusious [an electronic resource] // Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, First published Wed Jul 3, 2002; substantive revision Sat Mar 23, 2013. – access mode: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/confucius/#ConEth (the date of accessing 26.02.2105)

133

which includes health, force and beauty. Disharmony accordingly was

considered to be a disease, weakness and ugliness. This aspect results from the

PХКЭШ’s НШМЭrТЧО ШП К ЦКЧ КЧН КХsШ ЩЮЭs СОКХЭС ТЧ ШЧО sвЧШЧвЦТМ ХТЧО аТЭС ЛОКu- ty.

During the medieval culture, the basic principle of which is spirituality, the understanding of health based on the idea of belief. The medieval Christian worldview is built on the principal of Theocentrism, coming in return Antique Cosmocentrism.

As a result of that the notion of health and healthcare were considered in a fundamentally different way. First, the source of health and perfection in all aspects were believed to be the spirit. Second, belief became the so-called replacer of all methods of achieving health. Medical methods, in particular, were considered to be sinful and reprehensible. It was taken into consideration that only God can save a man.

The idea of faith was an absolute spiritual protection from spiritual, psychological and mental problems and diseases. The following thesis became actual: “Healing is faith”.

The considerable evidence, that there was a stable system of beliefs about

putting, accepting and solving all questions on the basis of religious position, is the words of Augustine: “…Кs ПШr ЭСО СОКХЭС ШП ЭСТs ЦШrЭКХ ЛШНв ШП ЦТne, while

there would be any use for me or for those, I love, I provide it Your will, Father all-wise and all-РШШН…”1.

Returning to the medieval culture, as a consequence of Christian radicalism in the exclusively spiritual health belief, nihilism everything sensual, bodily increased. In Russian culture V.V. Rozanov and N. Berdyaev; F. Nietzsche and M. Heidegger – in Western culture felt it and called the medieval culture – the culture of nihilism.

In contrast to the Western European medieval culture, by the way, in the Eastern Europe quite another paradigm of health understanding was built. The

progressive idea of the unity of the organism, following the Antique philoso-

ЩСОrs аКs sЮЩЩШrЭОН. GrОКЭ ЦОКЧТЧР ШП ТЧНТЯТНЮКХ’s ЩsвМСШХШРТМКХ sЭКЭО аКs Оm- phasized during Arabic medieval culture.

Replacing traditional medieval paradigm of faith and metaphysics, scientific and rational aspects started gradually taking precedence over religious one. People felt the immensity of their capabilities, without waiting for something from God. Faith in God gave way to the belief in human being, and the basic value was reckoned to be a human being. Under the aegis of such prin-

cipals a new epoch, called Renaissance, started. It was meant, that a man could ЦКЧКРО ШЧО’s СОКХЭС. AЧН the emphasis had shifted from the importance of spir-

itual aspects to the importance of physical aspects in understanding of health.

1 Augustine. About true religion. Theologically treatise. – Mn., 1999. – P. 354.

134

Francis Bacon1 (1561–1626) was one of the brightest representatives of

this culture. He developed the idea of the central position of a man in the World.

EЯОrвЭСТЧР ТЧ ЭСО АШrХН Тs ПШr ЭСО ЛОЧОПТЭ ШП К ЦКЧ. AММШrНТЧР ЭШ BКМШЧ’s ЩШsi-

ЭТШЧ, КЧв sМТОЧМО МКХХs ЮЩШЧ ЭШ ЛО sЮЛsОrЯТОЧЭ ЭШ ЩОШЩХО. TСКЭ’s ЭСО rОКsШЧ, аСв the health Sciences took the most important place in his study – health is blessing, one has since birth.

The Renaissance culture was so-called a transition phase from the spiritual component dominant to the physical component one, starting a new understanding of health. Besides, particularly this culture is marked as a process of the release of health Sciences from superstition, including religious ones. Bacon, by the way, aimed at distinguishing two spheres: science and

religion.

RОЭЮrЧТЧР ЭШ ЭСО BКМШЧ’s ЯТОаs, ТЭ sСШЮХН ЛО ЧШЭОН, ЭСКЭ ТЧ СТs ЭСОsТs, re- ferring to the main points of health, he is guided by the naturalistic approach. It means, firstly, that the basis of his interpretation is the biological aspect of a human being. And, secondly, it shows the necessity of different experiments and practice without any bans, which gave the opportunity to study the nature of a human being absolutely and completely. It also started to develop different sci-

ences, such as anatomy, physiology and so on.

TШ sЮЦ ЮЩ BКМШЧ’s ЯТОаs, СТs ТЧЭОrЩrОЭКЭТШЧ ШП СОКХЭС sСШЮХН ЛО ПШrЦЮХКt- ed, as a unity of physical and spiritual aspects, paying attention on impossibility of separating them, because of their interaction. The last thesis was quite significant for his days. He expressed it, following some Antique scientists: Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and some others.

The era of Modern history, namely the Age of Enlightenment, is marked

by the name of Immanuel Kant (1724–1804). He applied to the problem of СЮЦКЧ’s ЧКЭЮrО ЛКХКЧМО. HО sКТН: “A healthy man is someone, whose proportional excitemenЭ НШОsЧ’Э МКЮsО ЧОТЭСОr ОбМОssТЯО КМЭТШЧ, ЧШr ХТЭЭХО ШЧО”2. The scientist also added: “A ЩrШЛХОЦ ШП ШЧО’s ЧКЭЮrО КЧН ОбТsЭОЧМО Тs qЮТЭО ЦЮХЭТПКri-

ous and various, but its main base is the point of the relationship of spiritual, social, and biological aspects3”. But the understanding of such relationship is determined by the cultural development.

In summary, any culture through the history was restricted by particular views of the world and human being, of health and health care. The idea of integrity in the understanding of health in social context goes back to the ancient

philosophical ideas and theories. But the social concept of health regulation by

ЦОКЧs ШП ХТПОsЭвХО sМТОЧЭТПТМКХХв аКsЧ’Э ПШrЦЮХКЭОН. IЧМХЮНТЧР ЭСО sШМТКХ КsЩОМЭ ТЧ

1Bacon, Francis [an electronic resource] // Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography, 2008. – access mode: http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Francis_Bacon.aspx (the date of accessing 25.02.2105).

2Kant I. Essays in German and Russian languages: in four volumes. – V. 1. Treatises and articles (1784–1796). – M.: Kami, 1993. – P. 531.

3 Ibid. – P. 100.

135

the concept of health is meant addressing to the conditionality of health by the factors of lifestyle.

It might be presented by my understanding of that. I could choose three reasons of that. First of all, the sociology as a science started to be formed and developed only in the 19th century. Second, there was described a system of beliefs, that all problems and points were put on the basis of religious position, what was mentioned above. And third, there were some changes in cause of death. The first place was taken by the social diseases, such as smoking, drug and alcohol addiction, AIDS and such as. Different venereal ones became widely spread. But it had happened a bit later, in the 20th century.

Scientific rationale of that was formed in second half of the 20th century. Particularly in that period the sociology of health was founded. It was marked by the beginning of studying in the USA and Western Europe such social characteristics of health as subjective attitude, social aims and self-protective behavior.

References

1.Augustine. About true religion. Theologically treatise. – Mn., 1999.

2.Bacon, Francis [an electronic resource] // Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography, 2008. – access mode: http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Francis_Bacon. aspx (the date of accessing 25.02.2105).

3.Confusious [an electronic resource] // Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, First published Wed Jul 3, 2002; substantive revision Sat Mar 23, 2013. – access mode: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/confucius/#ConEth (the date of accessing 26.02.2105).

4.Kant I. Essays in German and Russian languages: in four volumes. – V.1. Treatises and articles (1784–1796). – M.: Kami, 1993.

136

314.7 /	60.5			.	. Ш
				.	. Ш
				.	,
		Ё	1	:
			1
А	.			ё
.				ё
.	-	.
		.	2009–2013		,
			2009–2013		,
	:	,	2014	.
	:	ё ,	,		,	,
		,	.

E.N. Sharova

Murmansk State Humanities University

Murmansk, Russia

MIGRATION ATTITUDES IN LIFE STRATEGIES OF YOUNG PEOPLE IN MURMANSK REGION: GENDER ASPECT

Abstract. The paper presents an analysis of gender differences in migration attitudes in the life strategies of Murmansk youth. The study methodologically based on the concept of gender asymmetry. The empirical resources of the analysis were the regional statistical data for the years 2009–2013, as well as materials of a questionnaire survey conducted in the spring of 2014.

Key words: youth, gender, gender asymmetry, region, migration attitudes, region, life strategies.

,		-
,	-
	.
,	.	-
-

(«

»), № 14-13-51001.

137

	,	«	,
		»1.	,
		»1.
–	–	(
	(	),	,
	(		,
,			).
,		-	(
)	,
	,	.	,
		.	,
	.	,	.
,	,		.
,	,
.
,	,		,
,	,	.
,		.
,		.
,
	.
2009–2013 .,			,
	,		,
	,	-
	2014 .
	,		,
.	.	,
	.	,

1	. .	-
1
	//	. – 2012. – № 3. URL: http://www.moluch.ru/archive/38/4342/.

138

	1	. 2014 .2,				1.
	1	. 2014 .2,
	16–29	19,4%		(149 693		.).
	90 545	2025 .					60
5	90 545	3.
5		(		.	. 1).
		(		.	. 1).		1
							1
						,	.


2009	4 484		4 651			-167
2010	4 438		5 355			-917
2011	8 034		8 345			-311
2012	9 474		10 426			-952
2013	8 894		10 668			-1774

2010, 2011 2013 .		.
2010, 2011 2013 .
1 774		,	.
			.			2014 .
						2014 .
		( .	. 2).				2
							2
							, %

				14–19	20–24	25–30
				55,2	60,2	53,3	55,8
				44,8	39,8	46,7	44,2
	.			51,0	49,5	51,1	50,6
	.			49,0	50,5	48,9	49,4
				49,0	50,5	48,9	49,4
				57,6	66,3	54,6	59,0
				42,4	33,7	45,4	41,0

1	. .		:
	. .		:
2	//	. –	, 2014. – . 133–139.
2		-
		-
	//URL:http://murmanskstat.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_ts/murmanskstat/r
3	u/municipal_statistics/main_indicators/.	2030	.	. URL:
3

http://murmanskstat.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_ts/murmanskstat/resources/.

139

											(	,	18%).
											(		18%).
	,										20–24		:
					,				(		32,6%).
	,	,			–						.
		,									.
												3.			,
												3.			3
											,				3
											,

							(		),		.
		-			-	(	)			(			)
						(	)			(			)
	.		.	.	.	.		.			.	.		.	.
2009	107		120	-324	-650	407		260			-14	-36		176	-306
2010	140		175	-835	-969	578		225			-20	-35		-137	-654
2011	231		201	-592	-1 289	700		326			-17	-31		322	-793
2012	191		188	-573	-1 197	259		217			-14	-27		-137	-819
2013	108		117	-957	-1 456	218		188			-25	-41		-656	-1 192
							(		),		.
2009	-107		-120	78	72	9		33			0	-2		-20	-17
2010	-140		-175	118	8	4		10			0	-1		-18	-158
2011	-231		-201	372	201	10		9			0	0		151	9
2012	-191		-188	253	105	11		14			1	-1		74	-70
2013	-108		-117	166	119	4		12			-1	-1		61	13
					.						,	2009–2013			.
					.		,				,		.		,
							,						.		,
				.	2013 .		2012		.,
				.	2013 .
					,	(-1 192
						(-1 192					-656).
							:				,	2013 .
					-1 456		-957
		.					,				,				,
															,
						140

	(166		119
	).			,
			,	,
	.		,
	.		,			:
			,			:
	– -25.					-41,
	– -25.
	,
,	,
	,					.
						.
	(	-	)	.
955	14	30	.
	,		,
(		3%).
						:
	(			;		,
	);			;
(	).					,
						,
				,		11,0%
.	( .	. 4).		(45,2%)
	( .	. 4).				4
				, %		4
				, %


,			21,9		21,9		21,8
			10,9		12,7		8,8

,	,		45,2		43,7		47,1
			45,2		43,7		47,1

			22,0		21,7		22,4
			100,0		100,0		100,0
,	,					(22,0%).
	,					.
						.

141

		:				,
8,8%).	,					(12,7
8,8%).		,
		,
	).	(				3,4%
	).					,
						,
				(	.	. 5).
	,	22,8%		,		,
	– 7,9%).			(		(48,4%)
	– 7,9%).					(48,4%)
,	).			(		19,7%
	).			,
				,
	.	,
	.					5
	,			, %		5
	,			, %


			19,7	18,1			21,8
	,		28,7	28,7			28,8
	,		28,8	28,1			29,7
	,		14,9	15,7			13,9
			7,9	9,4			5,9
			100,0	100,0			100,0
	,	:
	,	,
(9,4	5,9%	).
		.
,	(45,0%),					,
,						,
	–	(		-		),
		(17,4%) (		.	. 6).
						6
						, %


,	-		37,6	34,3			41,5
			45,0	43,9			46,3
			17,4	21,8			12,2
		142

		100,0		100,0		100,0
	,				(41,5
34,3%	),	-			(41,5
34,3%	),
	(21,8	12,2%			).
	.	356		.
			21		,
	(	8	–	.	. 7).
					7
				, %


		34,7		36,5		32,6
-		43,8		37,6		50,9
-		20,0		18,8		21,4
		13,1		14,5		11,4
		12,8		13,5		12,0
		4,0		6,2		1,6
		2,0		2,6		1,6
		2,1		2,5		1,6
		100,0		100,0		100,0
					,
,	-				(43,8%).
		,			(
	),	,			(
	),				(
	,
	).
,	,			(34,7%).
	,	,			-
-		,
		,	,		,
	.		,
	.
	,

143

		(32,3%		).
			(13,1 12,8%		).
			,		;
,			,		,
				,	.
		,		,
	,	,			,
	,		,		,
			,
(			,		)
			.
	14	(	5%).
				:		-
				:
(6,2	1,6%).		(50,9	37,6%),	–
(6,2	1,6%).
	,					–
.
			,
.		,			-
.		,
					,
	,				.	,
		,			,
.
1.	. .	Д	Ж //	. – 2012. – № 3. –		. 333–
		Д	Ж //	. – 2012. – № 3. –		. 333–
335.
2.			-

.URL: http://murmanskstat.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_ts/

murmanskstat/ru/municipal_statistics/main_indicators/.

144

3.					2030	.	. URL:
	http://murmanskstat.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_ts/murmanskstat/resources/.
4.	. .	//			:		:
		//			:
			:	.	/	.	. . .
	. –	:	-	, 2014. –	. 133–139.

145

<<< < Предыдущая 1 23 / 43 4 > Следующая >>>

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]

#
15.04.20231.17 Mб3UNperzRttz.pdf
#
15.04.20233.96 Mб2VFn823Sed8.pdf
#
15.04.20232.41 Mб3vII0rMmjA6.pdf
#
15.04.20231.14 Mб2vMkYLZErVP.pdf
#
15.04.20231.44 Mб0vUrInVrRIT.pdf
#
15.04.20231.86 Mб2VUzxCLyIhH.pdf
#
15.04.20231.51 Mб6VX3LgLx3E2.pdf
#
15.04.2023337.2 Кб1vYIHZDtn5V.pdf
#
15.04.20232.95 Mб4VynY616gN4.pdf
#
15.04.20231.89 Mб1W3xdYqrE6D.pdf
#
15.04.20232.04 Mб2whL1xqmmlp.pdf