wtR4VOdqbL
.pdf/ |
. |
|
, |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
(61,2%), |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
(40,8%). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
, |
|
|
: |
|
|
(50,2%) |
|
|
(47,6%). |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
, |
|
|
, |
|
. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,2 |
( 10- |
|
), |
|
– |
8,03. |
|
, |
|
|
|
, , . . |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
. |
|
|
|
(95,6%) |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
, |
|
, |
, |
|
|
|
|
. |
, |
« |
( ) |
, |
(88,5%) |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
», |
|
|
|
(50,4%) |
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
(69%), |
|
|
(86%) |
, |
|
|
, |
|
|
. |
|
|
(7% |
– 16 |
.) |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
,
,
,
. ,
, |
, |
101
6–8%. |
|
|
, |
|
№ 1 |
|
. |
|
|
|
, |
|
, |
: |
|
|
|
. |
|
|
, , |
, |
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
. |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
, |
, |
|
20% |
|
|
. |
||
(15%) |
, |
|
|
|
|
. |
, |
||
|
|
|
||
|
, |
. |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
, |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
. |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
9 |
(4,1%) |
|
, |
, , |
. |
, |
|
|
|
||
|
- |
|
|
( |
, |
, |
. |
.), . . |
|
|
. |
|
|
|
(18%), |
(21%) |
|
|
|
(4%). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
« |
», |
, |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
. |
102
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
5. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
). |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
||
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
, |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
« |
» |
|
|
|
|
, |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
. |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
, |
|
, |
|
( |
2013 |
.). |
( |
- |
2013 |
.) |
|
. |
6 |
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
, |
. |
|
2014 . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
. |
, |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
17 |
23 |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
.
, |
, |
- |
-,
, |
, |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
« |
: |
|
». |
, |
|
|
|
, |
|
|
. |
, |
|
, |
. |
104
|
|
. . |
|
( |
) |
|
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
« |
|
|
», |
|
|
, |
|
|
. |
|
: |
, |
, |
, |
, |
, |
. |
|
|
|
S.I. Petoshina |
Creation of social advertisements in the regional practice of social services (as exemplified by the Murmansk region)
Abstract. In this article the some means for social advertising creation in regional practice in social services are studied. The material is on the basis of data of sociological research “Social advertising as an instrument of social work”, held in the Murmansk region with the participation of the author, using qualitative and quantitative strategies, including different methods of collecting and analyzing information.
Keywords: social advertising, means for social advertising, social work, social institutions, social services, Murmansk region.
|
|
Д8, . 46Ж. |
|
|
, |
|
|
, |
|
|
. |
|
, |
Д3, . 210Ж. |
|
( |
, |
, |
, |
, |
. |
.). |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
105 |
|
|
. |
|
, |
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
, |
, |
|
|
|
Д2Ж. |
|
|
|
|
, |
, |
, |
PR Д4, |
. 48Ж. |
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
, |
/ |
, |
, |
. |
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
, |
|
|
Д4, |
. 42Ж. |
|
|
|
|
|
||
« |
|
|
|
», |
|
|
|
2013 |
, |
|
|
|
, |
. |
|
|
. |
– |
|
|
|
|
||
. |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
) |
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
12 |
. |
, |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
: |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
, |
|
, |
|
|
|
, |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
, |
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|
, . . |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
||
|
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.). |
( . |
, . |
|
, . |
|
|
, . |
|
|
. |
, |
|
|
|
219 |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
), |
, |
5%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
, |
|
|
, |
|
|
, |
, |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85,4%). |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
(36,5%), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
40 |
(29,2%) |
|
|
41 |
50 |
|
(21,9%). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
(12,3%). |
|
|
|
: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,6%), |
– |
|
|
|
|
18,7% |
1,8% |
|
|
(22,8%), |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
: |
50,7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, 41,6% – |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
– 7,8% |
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3- |
( |
|
|
) – 36,1%, |
3- |
10 |
– 33,8%, |
|
|
11 20 |
– 14,2% |
20 |
|
– 16%. |
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
.
107
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
( |
, |
, |
), |
. |
92–93]. |
|
|
|
|
|
Д8, . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
, |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
, |
(72,1%), |
|
(57,8%); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
(53,9%) |
|
(52,9%); |
|
– |
(9,8%) |
|
|
|
(7,8%) ( . |
. 1) Д8, |
. 93Ж. |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
№ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (%) |
1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
72,1% |
4. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. |
|
, |
, |
|
|
|
18,6% |
11. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
100%, . . |
|
|
||
,
. |
, |
,
- (
).
,
, ,
108
|
, |
|
, |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
, |
|
, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
: |
|
||
|
« |
|
|
|
… |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
, |
|
, |
|
, |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
… |
|
|
|
. |
|
! |
– |
|
. |
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
...» |
( |
|
|
, |
|
). |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
. |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
, |
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
: |
|
|
|
|
|
«… |
|
, |
3 |
, |
|
|
|
, |
|
- |
|
» ( |
|
|
|
«… |
|
). |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
, |
|
|
( |
)… |
|
… |
|
|
|
, |
… |
, |
, |
|
|
|
|
» ( |
|
). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( . . |
|
|
, . . |
, . |
, . . |
|
|
|
.) Д1; |
4; |
6; 7Ж |
, |
|
, |
|
|
: |
( |
|
); |
( |
, |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
, |
|
); |
- |
|
; |
|
( |
, |
, |
, |
|
|
) |
Д5, . |
85Ж. |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
109
,
|
|
|
|
|
Д8, . 97Ж. |
|
, |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60,6%), |
|
, |
||
|
(53,2%), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,3%). |
|
|
|
|
χ2 |
|
|
( |
|
98%). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
: |
|
|
« |
, |
|
». |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
« |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
» ( . |
. 2) Д8, |
. 97–98]. |
|
|
|
2 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
№ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
|
|
|
20,9% |
47,1% |
|
22,2% |
|
23,6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
|
|
|
|
34,1% |
29,4% |
|
28,7% |
|
31,0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
|
|
|
|
29,7% |
23,5% |
|
13,0% |
|
20,8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
- |
|
|
|
59,3% |
58,8% |
|
39,8% |
|
49,5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
|
|
|
|
44,0% |
35,3% |
|
31,5% |
|
37,0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
44,0% |
82,4% |
|
54,6% |
|
52,3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
, |
|
|
|
57,1% |
52,9% |
|
50,0% |
|
53,2% |
6. |
|
|
|
|
71,4% |
47,1% |
|
53,7% |
|
60,6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
|
|
|
|
27,5% |
29,4% |
|
19,4% |
|
23,6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. |
, |
|
|
|
28,6% |
23,5% |
|
26,9% |
|
27,3% |
9. |
|
|
|
|
13,2% |
17,6% |
|
15,7% |
|
14,8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. |
|
|
|
|
0% |
0% |
|
0% |
|
0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
100%, . . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
110