Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Книги по МРТ КТ на английском языке / MRI and CT of the Female Pelvis Hamm B., Forstner R..pdf
Скачиваний:
4
Добавлен:
05.10.2023
Размер:
41.73 Mб
Скачать

452

G. Heinz-Peer

 

 

a

b

c

Fig. 26  Endometrioma right ovary: sharply demarcated inhomogeneous cystic mass (M) in the right ovary with predominantly bright signal intensity on

endometriosis. MR imaging also helps to predict the outcome of conservative treatment of adenomyosis, leiomyoma, and endometriosis.

References

Bacelar AC, Wilcock D, Powell M, Worthington BS (1995) The value of MRI in the assessment of traumatic intrauterine adhesions (Asherman syndrome). Clin Radiol 50:80–83

Bartynski WS, Lin L (1997) Dynamic and conventional spin-echo MR of pituitary microlesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 18:965–972

axial T2W (a), intermediate signal intensity on axial T1W images (b), and no contrast uptake after iv application of Gd-DTPA (c)

Becker E Jr, Lev-Toaff AS, Kaufman EP, Halpern EJ, Edelweiss MI, Kurtz AB (2002) The additional value of transvaginal sonohysterography over transvaginal sonography alone in women with known or suspected leiomyoma. J Ultrasound Med 21:237–247

Braly PS (1999) Disease of the uterus. In: Scott JR, Di-Saia PJ, Hammond CB, Spellacy WN (eds) Danforth’s obstetrics and gynecology, 8th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, pp 837–855

Brody JM, Koelliker SL, Fishman GN (1998) Unicornuate uterus: imaging appearance, associated anomalies and clinical implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:1341–1347

Buttram VC, Gibbons WE (1979) Müllerian anomalies: a proposed classification (an analysis of 144 cases). Fertil Steril 32:40–46

Evaluation of Infertility

453

 

 

Carrington BM, Hricak H, Nuruddin RN, Secaf E, Laros RK Jr, Hill EC (1990) Müllerian duct anomalies: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 176:715–720

Collins JI, Woodward PJ (1995) Radiological evaluation of infertility. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 16:304–316

Fielding JR (1996) MR imaging of müllerian anomalies: impact on therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:1491–1495

Fleischer AC, Kepple DM (1997) Normal pelvic anatomy as depicted by various sonographic techniques. In: Fleischer AC, Javitt HC, Jeffrey RB Jr, Jones HW III (eds) Clinical gynaecologic imaging, Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott-Raven, pp 10–22

Goldberg JM, Falcone T, Attaran M (1997) Sonohysterographic evaluation of uterine anomalies noted on hysterosalpingography. Hum Reprod 12:1251–1253

Heinonen PK, Saarikoski S, Pystynen P (1982) Reproductive performance of women with uterine anomalies: an evaluation of 182 cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 61:157–162

Hornstein MD, Schust D (1996) Infertility. In: Berek JS, Adashi EY, Hillard PA (eds) Novak’s gynecology, 12th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, pp 915–962

Imaoka I, Wada A, Matsuo M, Yoshida M, Kitagaki H, Sugimura K (2003) MR imaging of disorders associated with female infertility: use in diagnosis, treatment, and management. Radiographics 23:1401–1421

Javitt MC (1997) Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies. In: Fleischer AC, Javitt MC, Jeffresy RB Jr, Jones HW Jr (eds) Clinical gynaecologic imaging. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 299–310

Justesen P, Rasmussen F, Anderson PE Jr (1986) Inadvertently performed hysterosalpingography during early pregnancy. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 27:711–713

Kimura I, Togashi K, Kawakami S et al (1996) Polycystic ovaries: implications of diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 201:549–552

Kupesic S, Kurjak A (2000) Ultrasound and Doppler assessment of uterine anomalies. In: Kupesic S, de Ziegler D (eds) Ultrasound and infertility Pearl River. Parthenon, New York, NY, pp 147–153

Kurman RJ, Mazur MT (1987) Benign diseases of the endometrium. In: Kurman RJ (ed) Blaustein’s pathology of the female genital tract, 3rd edn. Springer, New York, pp 292–321

Lev-Toaff AS (1996) Sonohysterography: evaluation of endometrial and myometrial abnormalities. Semin Roentgenol 31:288–298

Lindheim SR, Sprague C, Winter TC III (2006) Hysterosalpingography and sonohysterography: lessions in technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(1):24–29

Lujan ME, Jarrett BY, Brooks ED, Reines JK, Peppin AK, Muhn N, Haider E, Pierson RA, Chizen DR

(2013) Updated ultrasound criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome: reliable thresholds for elevated follicle population and ovarian volume. Hum Reprod 28(5):1361–1368

Margolin FR (1988) A new cannula for hysterosalpingography. AJR 151:729–730

Miki Y, Matsuo M, Nishizawa S et al (1990) Pituitary adenomas and normal pituitary tissue: enhancement patterns on gadopentate-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 177:35–38

Mitchell DG, Gefter WB, Spritzer CE et al (1986) Polycystic ovaries: MR imaging. Radiology 160:425–429

Nicolini U, Bellotti M, Bonazzi B, Zamberletti D, Candiani GB (1987) Can ultrasound be used to screen uterine malformations? Fertil Steril 47:89–93

Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Chiowanich P, Kilger AM, Dunton CJ, Talerman A (1998) Dilated fallopian tubes: MR imaging characteristics. Radiology 208:463–469

Patton PE (1994) Anatomic uterine defects. Clin Obstet Gynecol 37:705–721

Pellerito JS, McCarthy SM, Doyle MB et al (1992) Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accuracy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography. Radiology 183:795–800

Pittaway DE, Winfield AC, Maxson W, Daniell J, Herbert C, Wentz AC (1983) Prevention of acute pelvic inflammatory disease after hysterosalpingography: efficacy of doxycycline prophylaxis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 147:623–626

Rock JA (1997) Surgery for anomalies of the müllerian ducts. In: Rock JA, Thompson JD (eds) Te Linde’s operative gynecology, 8th edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa, pp 687–729

Rock JA, Jones HW Jr (1977) The clinical management of the double uterus. Fertil Steril 28:798–806

Sadowski EA, Elizabeth A, Jennifer E, Ochsner JE, Jody M, Riherd JM, Frank R, Korosec FR, Agrawal G, Pritts EA, Klie MA (2008) MR hysterosalpingography with an angiographic time-resolved 3D pulse sequence: assessment of tubal patency. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1381–1385

Schenken RS (1999) Endometriosis. In: Scott JR, Di-Saia PJ, Hammond CB, Spellacy WN (eds) Danforth’s obstetrics and gynecology, 8th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, pp 669–675

Sholkoff SD (1987) Balloon hysterosalpingography catheter. AJR 149:995–996

Soules MR, Spadoni LR (1982) Oil versus aqueous media for hysterosalpingography: a continuing debate based on many options and few facts. Fertil Steril 38:1–11

Strübbe EH, Willemsen WNP, Lemmens JAM, Thijn CJP, Rolland R (1993) Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: distinction between two forms based on excretory urographic, sonographic, and laparoscopic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160:331–334

The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal obstruction, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, mül-

454

G. Heinz-Peer

 

 

lerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions (1988). Fertil Steril 49:944–955

Thompson JD, Rock JA (1997) Leiomyoma uteri and myomectomy. In: Rock JA, Thompson JD (eds) Te Linde’s operative gynecology, 8th edn. Lippincott-­ Raven, Philadelphia, PA, pp 731–770

Thurmond AS, Uchida BT, Rosch J (1990) Device for hysterosalpingography and fallopian tuber catherization. Radiology 174:571–572

Togashi K, Nishimura K, Itoh K, Fujisawa I, Nakano Y, Torizuka K, Ozasa H, Ohshima M (1987) Vaginal agenesis: classification by MR imaging. Radiology 162:675–677

Tukeva TA, Aronen HJ, Karjalainen PT, Molander P, Paavonen T, Paavonen J (1999) MR imaging in pelvic inflammatory disease: comparison with laparoscopy and US. Radiology 210:209–216