- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Posterior Compartment
- •2.2 Anterior Compartment
- •2.3 Middle Compartment
- •2.4 Perineal Body
- •3 Compartments
- •3.1 Posterior Compartment
- •3.1.1 Connective Tissue Structures
- •3.1.2 Muscles
- •3.1.3 Reinterpreted Anatomy and Clinical Relevance
- •3.2 Anterior Compartment
- •3.2.1 Connective Tissue Structures
- •3.2.2 Muscles
- •3.2.3 Reinterpreted Anatomy and Clinical Relevance
- •3.2.4 Important Vessels, Nerves, and Lymphatics of the Anterior Compartment
- •3.3 Middle Compartment
- •3.3.1 Connective Tissue Structures
- •3.3.2 Muscles
- •3.3.3 Reinterpreted Anatomy and Clinical Relevance
- •3.3.4 Important Vessels, Nerves, and Lymphatics of the Middle Compartment
- •4 Perineal Body
- •References
- •MR and CT Techniques
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2.1 Spasmolytic Medication
- •2.3.2 Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
- •2.3.3 Dynamic Contrast Enhancement
- •3 CT Technique
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Technical Disadvantages
- •3.4 Oral and Rectal Contrast
- •References
- •Uterus: Normal Findings
- •1 Introduction
- •References
- •1 Clinical Background
- •1.1 Epidemiology
- •1.2 Clinical Presentation
- •1.3 Embryology
- •1.4 Pathology
- •2 Imaging
- •2.1 Technique
- •2.2.1 Class I Anomalies: Dysgenesis
- •2.2.2 Class II Anomalies: Unicornuate Uterus
- •2.2.3 Class III Anomalies: Uterus Didelphys
- •2.2.4 Class IV Anomalies: Bicornuate Uterus
- •2.2.5 Class V Anomalies: Septate Uterus
- •2.2.6 Class VI Anomalies: Arcuate Uterus
- •2.2.7 Class VII Anomalies
- •References
- •Benign Uterine Lesions
- •1 Background
- •1.1 Uterine Leiomyomas
- •1.1.1 Epidemiology
- •1.1.2 Pathogenesis
- •1.1.3 Histopathology
- •1.1.4 Clinical Presentation
- •1.1.5 Therapy
- •1.1.5.1 Indications
- •1.1.5.2 Medical Therapy and Ablation
- •1.1.5.3 Surgical Therapy
- •1.1.5.4 Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE)
- •1.1.5.5 Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound
- •2 Adenomyosis of the Uterus
- •2.1 Epidemiology
- •2.2 Pathogenesis
- •2.3 Histopathology
- •2.4 Clinical Presentation
- •2.5 Therapy
- •3 Imaging
- •3.2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •3.2.1 Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Technique
- •3.2.2 MR Appearance of Uterine Leiomyomas
- •3.2.3 Locations, Growth Patterns, and Imaging Characteristics
- •3.2.4 Histologic Subtypes and Forms of Degeneration
- •3.2.5 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.2.6 MR Appearance of Uterine Adenomyosis
- •3.2.7 Locations, Growth Patterns, and Imaging Characteristics
- •3.2.8 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.3 Computed Tomography
- •3.3.1 CT Technique
- •3.3.2 CT Appearance of Uterine Leiomyoma and Adenomyosis
- •3.3.3 Atypical Appearances on CT and Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1 Indications
- •4.2 Technique
- •Bibliography
- •Cervical Cancer
- •1 Background
- •1.1 Epidemiology
- •1.2 Pathogenesis
- •1.3 Screening
- •1.4 HPV Vaccination
- •1.5 Clinical Presentation
- •1.6 Histopathology
- •1.7 Staging
- •1.8 Growth Patterns
- •1.9 Treatment
- •1.9.1 Treatment of Microinvasive Cervical Cancer
- •1.9.2 Treatment of Grossly Invasive Cervical Carcinoma (FIGO IB-IVA)
- •1.9.3 Treatment of Recurrent Disease
- •1.9.4 Treatment of Cervical Cancer During Pregnancy
- •1.10 Prognosis
- •2 Imaging
- •2.1 Indications
- •2.1.1 Role of CT and MRI
- •2.2 Imaging Technique
- •2.2.2 Dynamic MRI
- •2.2.3 Coil Technique
- •2.2.4 Vaginal Opacification
- •2.3 Staging
- •2.3.1 General MR Appearance
- •2.3.2 Rare Histologic Types
- •2.3.3 Tumor Size
- •2.3.4 Local Staging
- •2.3.4.1 Stage IA
- •2.3.4.2 Stage IB
- •2.3.4.3 Stage IIA
- •2.3.4.4 Stage IIB
- •2.3.4.5 Stage IIIA
- •2.3.4.6 Stage IIIB
- •2.3.4.7 Stage IVA
- •2.3.4.8 Stage IVB
- •2.3.5 Lymph Node Staging
- •2.3.6 Distant Metastases
- •2.4 Specific Diagnostic Queries
- •2.4.1 Preoperative Imaging
- •2.4.2 Imaging Before Radiotherapy
- •2.5 Follow-Up
- •2.5.1 Findings After Surgery
- •2.5.2 Findings After Chemotherapy
- •2.5.3 Findings After Radiotherapy
- •2.5.4 Recurrent Cervical Cancer
- •2.6.1 Ultrasound
- •2.7.1 Metastasis
- •2.7.2 Malignant Melanoma
- •2.7.3 Lymphoma
- •2.8 Benign Lesions of the Cervix
- •2.8.1 Nabothian Cyst
- •2.8.2 Leiomyoma
- •2.8.3 Polyps
- •2.8.4 Rare Benign Tumors
- •2.8.5 Cervicitis
- •2.8.6 Endometriosis
- •2.8.7 Ectopic Cervical Pregnancy
- •References
- •Endometrial Cancer
- •1.1 Epidemiology
- •1.2 Pathology and Risk Factors
- •1.3 Symptoms and Diagnosis
- •2 Endometrial Cancer Staging
- •2.1 MR Protocol for Staging Endometrial Carcinoma
- •2.2.1 Stage I Disease
- •2.2.2 Stage II Disease
- •2.2.3 Stage III Disease
- •2.2.4 Stage IV Disease
- •4 Therapeutic Approaches
- •4.1 Surgery
- •4.2 Adjuvant Treatment
- •4.3 Fertility-Sparing Treatment
- •5.1 Treatment of Recurrence
- •6 Prognosis
- •References
- •Uterine Sarcomas
- •1 Epidemiology
- •2 Pathology
- •2.1 Smooth Muscle Tumours
- •2.2 Endometrial Stromal Tumours
- •3 Clinical Background
- •4 Staging
- •5 Imaging
- •5.1 Leiomyosarcoma
- •5.2.3 Undifferentiated Uterine Sarcoma
- •5.3 Adenosarcoma
- •6 Prognosis and Treatment
- •References
- •1.1 Anatomical Relationships
- •1.4 Pelvic Fluid
- •2 Developmental Anomalies
- •2.1 Congenital Abnormalities
- •2.2 Ovarian Maldescent
- •3 Ovarian Transposition
- •References
- •1 Introduction
- •4 Benign Adnexal Lesions
- •4.1.1 Physiological Ovarian Cysts: Follicular and Corpus Luteum Cysts
- •4.1.1.1 Imaging Findings in Physiological Ovarian Cysts
- •4.1.1.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1.2 Paraovarian Cysts
- •4.1.2.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.1.2.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1.3 Peritoneal Inclusion Cysts
- •4.1.3.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.1.3.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1.4 Theca Lutein Cysts
- •4.1.4.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.1.4.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1.5 Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
- •4.1.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.1.5.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.2.1 Cystadenoma
- •4.2.1.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.2.1.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.2.2 Cystadenofibroma
- •4.2.2.1 Imaging Features
- •4.2.3 Mature Teratoma
- •4.2.3.1 Mature Cystic Teratoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •4.2.3.2 Monodermal Teratoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •4.2.4 Benign Sex Cord-Stromal Tumors
- •4.2.4.1 Fibroma and Thecoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •4.2.4.2 Sclerosing Stromal Tumor
- •Imaging Findings
- •4.2.5 Brenner Tumors
- •4.2.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.2.5.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •5 Functioning Ovarian Tumors
- •References
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Context
- •2.2.2 Indications According to Simple Rules
- •References
- •CT and MRI in Ovarian Carcinoma
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Familial or Hereditary Ovarian Cancers
- •3 Screening for Ovarian Cancer
- •5 Tumor Markers
- •6 Clinical Presentation
- •7 Imaging of Ovarian Cancer
- •7.1.2 Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- •7.1.3 Ascites
- •7.3 Staging of Ovarian Cancer
- •7.3.1 Staging by CT and MRI
- •Imaging Findings According to Tumor Stages
- •Value of Imaging
- •7.3.2 Prediction of Resectability
- •7.4 Tumor Types
- •7.4.1 Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
- •High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
- •Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
- •Mucinous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
- •Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinomas
- •Clear Cell Carcinomas
- •Imaging Findings of Epithelial Ovarian Cancers
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Borderline Tumors
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Value of Imaging
- •Malignant Germ Cell Tumors
- •Dysgerminomas
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Immature Teratomas
- •Imaging Findings
- •Malignant Transformation in Benign Teratoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Sex-Cord Stromal Tumors
- •Granulosa Cell Tumors
- •Imaging Findings
- •Sertoli-Leydig Cell Tumor
- •Imaging Findings
- •Ovarian Lymphoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •7.4.3 Ovarian Metastases
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •7.5 Fallopian Tube Cancer
- •7.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •References
- •Endometriosis
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Sonography
- •3 MR Imaging Findings
- •References
- •Vagina and Vulva
- •1 Introduction
- •3.1 CT Appearance
- •3.2 MRI Protocol
- •3.3 MRI Appearance
- •4.1 Imperforate Hymen
- •4.2 Congenital Vaginal Septa
- •4.3 Vaginal Agenesis
- •5.1 Vaginal Cysts
- •5.1.1 Gardner Duct Cyst (Mesonephric Cyst)
- •5.1.2 Bartholin Gland Cyst
- •5.2.1 Vaginal Infections
- •5.2.1.1 Vulvar Infections
- •5.2.1.2 Vulvar Thrombophlebitis
- •5.3 Vulvar Trauma
- •5.4 Vaginal Fistula
- •5.5 Post-Radiation Changes
- •5.6 Benign Tumors
- •6.1 Vaginal Malignancies
- •6.1.1 Primary Vaginal Carcinoma
- •6.1.1.1 MRI Findings
- •6.1.1.2 Lymph Node Drainage
- •6.1.1.3 Recurrence and Complications
- •6.1.2 Non-squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Vagina
- •6.1.2.1 Adenocarcinoma
- •6.1.2.2 Melanoma
- •6.1.2.3 Sarcomas
- •6.1.2.4 Lymphoma
- •6.2 Vulvar Malignancies
- •6.2.1 Vulvar Carcinoma
- •6.2.2 Melanoma
- •6.2.3 Lymphoma
- •6.2.4 Aggressive Angiomyxoma of the Vulva
- •7 Vaginal Cuff Disease
- •7.1 MRI Findings
- •8 Foreign Bodies
- •References
- •Imaging of Lymph Nodes
- •1 Background
- •3 Technique
- •3.1.1 Intravenous Unspecific Contrast Agents
- •3.1.2 Intravenous Tissue-Specific Contrast Agents
- •References
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.1.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.1.3 Value of Imaging
- •2.2 Pelvic Inflammatory
- •2.2.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.3 Hydropyosalpinx
- •2.3.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.3.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.4 Tubo-ovarian Abscess
- •2.4.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.4.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.4.3 Value of Imaging
- •2.5 Ovarian Torsion
- •2.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.5.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.5.3 Diagnostic Value
- •2.6 Ectopic Pregnancy
- •2.6.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.6.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.6.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.1 Pelvic Congestion Syndrome
- •3.1.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.1.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.1.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.2 Ovarian Vein Thrombosis
- •3.2.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.2.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.2.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.3 Appendicitis
- •3.3.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.3.2 Value of Imaging
- •3.4 Diverticulitis
- •3.4.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.4.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.4.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.5 Epiploic Appendagitis
- •3.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.5.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.5.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.6 Crohn’s Disease
- •3.6.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.6.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.6.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.7 Rectus Sheath Hematoma
- •3.7.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.7.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.7.3 Value of Imaging
- •References
- •MRI of the Pelvic Floor
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Imaging Techniques
- •3.1 Indications
- •3.2 Patient Preparation
- •3.3 Patient Instruction
- •3.4 Patient Positioning
- •3.5 Organ Opacification
- •3.6 Sequence Protocols
- •4 MR Image Analysis
- •4.1 Bony Pelvis
- •5 Typical Findings
- •5.1 Anterior Compartment
- •5.2 Middle Compartment
- •5.3 Posterior Compartment
- •5.4 Levator Ani Muscle
- •References
- •Evaluation of Infertility
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Imaging Techniques
- •2.1 Hysterosalpingography
- •2.1.1 Cycle Considerations
- •2.1.2 Technical Considerations
- •2.1.3 Side Effects and Complications
- •2.1.5 Pathological Findings
- •2.1.6 Limitations of HSG
- •2.2.1 Cycle Considerations
- •2.2.2 Technical Considerations
- •2.2.2.1 Normal and Abnormal Anatomy
- •2.2.3 Accuracy
- •2.2.4 Side Effects and Complications
- •2.2.5 Limitations of Sono-HSG
- •2.3 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •2.3.1 Indications
- •2.3.2 Technical Considerations
- •2.3.3 Limitations
- •3 Ovulatory Dysfunction
- •4 Pituitary Adenoma
- •5 Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome
- •7 Uterine Disorders
- •7.1 Müllerian Duct Anomalies
- •7.1.1 Class I: Hypoplasia or Agenesis
- •7.1.2 Class II: Unicornuate
- •7.1.3 Class III: Didelphys
- •7.1.4 Class IV: Bicornuate
- •7.1.5 Class V: Septate
- •7.1.6 Class VI: Arcuate
- •7.1.7 Class VII: Diethylstilbestrol Related
- •7.2 Adenomyosis
- •7.3 Leiomyoma
- •7.4 Endometriosis
- •References
- •MR Pelvimetry
- •1 Clinical Background
- •1.3.1 Diagnosis
- •1.3.2.1 Cephalopelvic Disproportion
- •1.3.4 Inadequate Progression of Labor due to Inefficient Contraction (“the Powers”)
- •2.2 Palpation of the Pelvis
- •3 MR Pelvimetry
- •3.2 MR Imaging Protocol
- •3.3 Image Analysis
- •3.4 Reference Values for MR Pelvimetry
- •5 Indications for Pelvimetry
- •References
- •MR Imaging of the Placenta
- •2 Imaging of the Placenta
- •3 MRI Protocol
- •4 Normal Appearance
- •4.1 Placenta Variants
- •5 Placenta Adhesive Disorders
- •6 Placenta Abruption
- •7 Solid Placental Masses
- •9 Future Directions
- •References
- •Erratum to: Endometrial Cancer
212 R. Lucas and T.M. Cunha
Table 2 2009 FIGO staging systems for uterine sarcomas
Uterine leiomyosarcoma and endometrial stromal sarcoma
Stage I |
Tumour limited to uterus |
IA |
≤5 cm |
IB |
>5 cm |
Stage II |
Tumour extends beyond the uterus, within the pelvis |
|
|
IIA |
Adnexal involvement |
IIB |
Involvement of other pelvic tissues |
Stage III |
Tumour invades abdominal tissues (not just protruding into the abdomen) |
IIIA |
One site |
|
|
IIIB |
More than one site |
IIIC |
Metastasis to pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph nodes |
Stage IV |
|
IVA |
Tumour invades bladder and/or rectum |
|
|
IVB |
Distant metastasis |
Uterine adenosarcoma |
|
Stage I |
Tumour limited to uterus |
IA |
Tumour limited to endometrium/endocervix with no myometrial invasion |
|
|
IB |
Less than or equal to half myometrial invasion |
|
|
IC |
More than half myometrial invasion |
Stage II |
Tumour extends beyond the uterus, within the pelvis |
IIA |
Adnexal involvement |
|
|
IIB |
Involvement of other pelvic tissues |
|
|
Stage III |
Tumour invades abdominal tissues (not just protruding into the abdomen) |
IIIA |
One site |
IIIB |
More than one site |
|
|
IIIC |
Metastasis to pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph nodes |
|
|
Stage IV |
|
IVA |
Tumour invades bladder and/or rectum |
IVB |
Distant metastasis |
|
|
uterine sarcomas. However in pretreatment evaluation, staging largely depends on imaging as the clinical evaluation is very limited.
Due to their different biologic behaviour, in 2009 FIGO introduced two new dedicated staging systems, specifically designed for uterine sarcomas, in which the morphological tumour subtype determines which staging system is used: one staging system for leiomyosarcoma and endometrial stromal sarcoma and a different system for adenosarcoma (Prat 2009a, b) (Table 2).
Adenosarcoma tends to arise at the endometrial or cervical surface, progressively invading the myometrium or cervical stroma in a similar way to endometrial carcinomas. The staging system is comparable to endometrial carcinomas, whereas leiomyosarcoma and endometrial stromal
sarcoma that usually arise within the myometrium and have a different tumoural progression are staged in a different fashion.
5\ Imaging
Imaging plays an important role in the evaluation of disease extent and treatment decision, even though the diagnosis relies on the histological examination. Endometrial sampling may yield the correct diagnosis but not in all patients: cases that arise within the endometrium may be indistinguishable from endometrial carcinoma, whereas those that arise from the myometrium may be indistinguishable from degenerating leiomyomas (Sala et al. 2013).
Uterine Sarcomas |
213 |
|
|
Table 3 Key points in the evaluation of sarcomatous uterine lesions |
|
|
|
Tumour limits/interface |
Early-stage uterine leiomyosarcomas can be well-circumscribed, while more advanced |
|
lesions typically have an irregular contour. On the other hand, endometrial stromal |
|
sarcomas may exhibit a diffusely infiltrative pattern of myometrial invasion |
Depth of myometrial |
Important in the substaging of stage I adenosarcomas: Stage IA tumours are limited to |
invasion |
the endometrium, stage IB invades less than or half of myometrium thickness and stage |
|
IC equates to more than one half myometrial invasion. It is also considered a risk factor |
|
for recurrence |
|
Since most other uterine sarcomas are predominantly myometrial-based lesions, |
|
myometrial invasion is not considered in the staging of these neoplasms |
Cervical involvement |
It has an adverse influence on prognosis, for example, in the case of a leiomyosarcomas |
|
|
Adnexal involvement |
Adnexal involvement affects the tumour stage (FIGO stage IIA) and may occur as |
|
result of direct extension or metastatic spread of tumour |
Lymph nodes |
Pelvic or para-aortic lymph node involvement upstages uterine sarcomas to stage IIIC |
Involvement of pelvic |
Other sites of pelvic tumour involvement should be documented since this equates to |
tissues |
FIGO stage IIB |
|
|
Involvement of omentum |
The number of affected locations in peritoneal tissue is important as FIGO stage IIIA |
and other abdominal |
equates to one site of abdominal involvement and IIIB to more than one site |
tissues |
|
|
|
Pre-surgical subtyping of uterine sarcomas is very important for therapeutic management. Even though the imaging findings of uterine sarcomas have a considerable overlap, there are however some specific features that can narrow the differential diagnosis list.
Ultrasound is usually the first-line study to evaluate women for potential uterine pathology as it is a readily available, non-invasive and relatively inexpensive technique. It gives an initial evaluation of the size and location of the lesion and may identify features suggestive of aggressiveness; however, the accuracy is very low.
Computed tomography (CT) is mainly used for staging in the assessment of extra-pelvic disease, distant metastases and follow-up.
The primary modality for imaging uterine sarcomas is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to the improved ability of this technique to delineate local disease.
When evaluating a possible sarcomatous uterine lesion with MRI, there are some specific key points that are important to evaluate as described in Table 3 (McCluggage et al. 2014).
5.1\ Leiomyosarcoma
Leiomyosarcomas are rare typically large lesions (>10 cm) presenting as solitary masses with areas
of haemorrhage and necrosis that may bulge into and distort the uterine cavity, but the epicentre is in the myometrium (Kurman et al. 2014).
Pelvic ultrasound is commonly the first-line study to evaluate women for potential uterine pathology. Some findings such as heterogeneous echo texture, central necrosis and colour Doppler findings of irregular vessel distribution might suggest the diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma; however sonographic evaluation is highly unspecific and hard to differentiate from leiomyomas (the most common myometrial tumour) (Amant et al. 2009).
Leiomyosarcomas commonly cause massive uterine enlargement, demonstrating heterogeneous low to intermediate signal intensity and scattered hyperintense foci on T1-weighted images (WI), whereas on T2-WI they are irregular and ill-defined lesions with intermediate to high signal intensity with cystic areas denoting necrosis (present in >50% of cases) (Santos and Cunha 2015). Detection of scattered foci of haemorrhages or necrosis may suggest the diagnosis; however signal intensity alone is not a reliable indicator of malignancy (Amant et al. 2009) (Fig. 1).
As stated before, leiomyosarcomas and leiomyomas are independent entities with differing cytogenetic abnormalities that can however coexist (Bodner et al. 2003; Hodge and Morton 2007;
214 |
R. Lucas and T.M. Cunha |
|
|
a |
b |
c |
d |
Fig. 1 Leiomyosarcoma in a 56-year-old woman. Coronal (a) and sagittal (b) T2-WI show marked uterine enlargement due to a heterogeneous myometrial tumour that invades the pelvic wall on the left (arrow), with
intense enhancement in solid areas showed here in axial (c) and coronal (d) gadolinium-enhanced T1-WI with fat suppression and extensive areas of tumoural necrosis
McCluggage 2002a). Benign leiomyomas develop primarily in women of reproductive age and typically stabilize or diminish in size following menopause. In contrast, increasing age is a significant risk factor for uterine sarcomas, and new or a rapidly growing uterine mass warrants further evaluation in menopausal women.
There is however a considerable overlap in the MR appearance, signal intensity and enhancement characteristics of leiomyosarcoma and leiomyomas with atypical imaging features (Schwartz et al. 1998; Cornfield et al. 2010). As so the diagnosis of uterine sarcomas can be incidental in histopathology analysis following hysterectomy (Sagae et al. 2004). It should also
be highlighted that with the development of laparoscopic surgery, morcellation of presumed leiomyomas has resulted in suboptimal treatment in patients with previously undiagnosed uterine sarcomas and reinforcing the need of better preoperative tumour characterization (Sutton 2013).
It has been suggested that an irregular contour, high signal on T2-WI and hyperintense areas on T1-WI could favour leiomyosarcoma against leiomyoma, but the specificity of this finding has not been established (Cornfield et al. 2010; Murase et al. 1999; Tanaka et al. 2004). The absence of calcifications is also a consistent finding in leiomyosarcomas (Schwartz et al. 1998).
Uterine Sarcomas |
|
215 |
|
|
|
a |
b |
c |
d |
e |
Fig. 2 Myxoid leiomyosarcoma in a 60-year-old, appearing to grow from a solid anterior myometrial nodule (asterisk on sagittal – a and axial T2-WI – b) and communicating with an exuberant multiloculated cystic
component, with multiple fluid levels (c). On axial T1-WI with fat saturation and contrast administration (d and e), some levels have high signal (arrow) related to haemorrhagic content
a |
b |
c |
Fig. 3 Epithelioid leiomyosarcoma in a 43-year-old woman. This subserosal tumour arises from the right posterior uterine wall. On sagittal T2-WI (a and b) the flow
voids of the connecting vessels are easily seen (arrows). On axial T2-WI (c) this lesion is seen on the right of the uterine cervix. The endometrial cavity is indistinct
The myxoid and epithelioid variants can have a more diverse appearance, and the establishment of the diagnosis is particularly difficult in these cases (Figs. 2 and 3).
Leiomyosarcomas demonstrate early haematogenous spread to the lungs and liver (Sala et al. 2013). Involvement of pelvic lymph nodes is uncommon and usually associated with advanced intra-abdominal disease and decreased survival (Leitao et al. 2003; Kapp et al. 2008) (Fig. 4).
The major advantage of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences is the delineation of malignant lesions DWI seems to be a potentially useful tool in soft tissue characterization of large uterine lesions: the high nuclear-to-cytoplasm ratio in tumour cells limits intracellular motion of water molecules in uterine sarcomas and these lesions are depicted as hyperintense lesions on DWI and low signal on the corresponding apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps.
216 |
|
R. Lucas and T.M. Cunha |
|
|
|
a |
b |
c |
d |
e |
f |
Fig.4 Leiomyosarcoma in a 55-year-old woman. Coronal T2-WI of the pelvis (a) shows marked uterine enlargement due to a heterogeneous myometrial tumour with areas of high signal. Axial T2-WI, at the level of the pulmonary bases (b and c), reveals pulmonary metastases and posterior mediastinum enlarged lymph nodes (c). In axial
gadolinium-enhanced T1-WI with fat suppression (d), the tumour demonstrates early intense peripheral enhancement with irregular central zones of low signal intensity denoting extensive necrosis. Endometrial cavity is difficult to depict. DWI-MR (e) and ADC map (f) show restricted diffusion in the solid areas of the lesion
Leiomyosarcomas display restriction in DWI studies.
DWI proved to reduce misdiagnoses of uterine sarcoma as benign leiomyoma with high accuracy (Thomassin-Naggara et al. 2013). DWI combined with T2-WI is even better than DWI alone in the differentiation of uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas (Namimoto et al. 2009). It is however important to recall, as a potential pitfall, that non-malignant lesions with high cellular density, such as high celular leiomyomas, may have restricted diffusion.
Positron emission tomography (PET) combined with CT adds metabolic information to morphologic data; However the main role of PET-CT is confined to post-therapy surveillance in order to detect distant metastasis or local recurrence, it appears to exist a significant variability in fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) mean standard uptake values (SUVs) between benign and malignant neoplasms (Tirumani et al. 2013; Kao et al. 2011).
5.2\ Endometrial Stromal
Sarcomas
The ultrasonographic evaluation of these lesions is highly unspecific. They appear as heterogeneous hypoechoic endometrial masses with irregular endometrial-myometrial interface, sometimes with fingerlike invasive myometrial projections and low-resistance intralesional arteries on Doppler (Amant et al. 2009; Gandolfo et al. 2000).
T2-WI are the most helpful MR sequences in detecting the endometrial nature of the tumours and its relationships with surrounding myometrium (Gandolfo et al. 2000).
Another feature that may suggest endometrial stromal sarcoma, observed in about one third of the cases, is the continuous extension of the lesion into adjacent structures most commonly the ovary, but also the fallopian tubes, the surrounding ligaments and vessels (Koyama et al. 1999). Digitiform tumour extension is best delineated on DWI (Tamai et al. 2008), differing from
Uterine Sarcomas |
|
217 |
|
|
|
a |
b |
c |
Fig. 5 Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma in a 62-year-old woman with postmenopausal bleeding. Sagittal (a) and axial (b) T2-WI of the pelvis demonstrate a high signal endometrial polypoid lesion, with ill-defined endometrial/myometrial border and without evidence of a
well-defined myometrial mass. DWI-MRI (c) allowed better identification of the lesion and revealed bands of low signal intensity (arrow) representing preserved bundles of the myometrium. Histopathology revealed internal myometrial invasion
intravenous leiomyomatosis due to tumoural high signal (Riopel et al. 2005).
Lymph node metastases occur in up to 30% of patients, and besides pelvic chain, spread to paraaortic nodes has also been reported (Fekete and Vellios 1984).
5.2.1\ Low-Grade Endometrial
Stromal Sarcoma
These tumours occur in a younger age group compared to high-grade lesions, usually involve the endometrium forming a polyp of homogeneous high signal intensity on T2-WI, which may be infarcted or haemorrhagic (Fig. 5).
There is myometrial invasion and an infiltrative growth pattern that may form deceptively well-demarcated nodules in the myometrium or may cause myometrial diffuse thickening without evidence of a well-defined tumour (Tamai et al. 2008). In some cases this diffuse thickening can be been misinterpreted as adenomyosis and, if more localized, can present as a myometrial mass mimicking a degenerated cystic leiomyoma, however without the typical well-defined border. In the presence of a large myometrial lesion, it is extremely important to evaluate the adjacent endometrial thickness, endometrial-myometrial border and lesion margin (Koyama et al. 1999).
On MRI, these lesions have heterogeneous signal intensity on both T1and T2-WI (Gandolfo
et al. 2000; Koyama et al. 1999), and the most important imaging feature is the presence of bands of low signal intensity on T2-WI invading the myometrium, representing preserved muscular bundles.
Tumour enhancement is commonly heterogeneous and isoor hyperintense when compared with normal myometrium (in contrast to endometrial carcinoma, which enhances less than normal myometrium) (Sala et al. 2013). Sometimes signal voids can be observed reflecting the hypervascular nature of these tumours (Koyama et al. 1999).
Although low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas have an indolent clinical course there is a significant tendency for recurrence (Fig. 6).
5.2.2\ High-Grade Endometrial
Stromal Sarcoma
Recently a subset of endometrial stromal sarcomas has been discovered with a unique gene rearrangement, distinct morphologic features and an intermediate prognosis between low-grade and undifferentiated stromal sarcomas, supporting the need to consider these tumours a separated category (Lee et al. 2012).
On MRI, the T2-WI hypointense preserved bundles of myometrial fibres are much thinner, scattered and harder to depict compared to lowgrade lesions, due to a more aggressive growth (Koyama et al. 1999) (Fig. 7).
218 |
R. Lucas and T.M. Cunha |
|
|
a |
b |
c |
d |
Fig. 6 Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma recurrence in a 70-year-old woman 2 years after surgery. Axial (a) and sagittal (b) T2-WI images demonstrate a large heterogeneous cystic and solid mass in the vaginal cuff. On
axial T1-WI (c) the lesion in hypointense, with faint enhancement after contrast on T1-WI fat supressed acquisition (d).
a |
b |
c |
d |
e |
f |
Fig. 7 High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma in a 75-year-old woman. Coronal (a) and sagittal T2-WI (b) revealed a heterogeneous mass with necrotic areas (asterisk) extending to the cervix, with heterogeneous enhancement after gadolinium administration (c), high-signal foci
on T1-WI (d) (arrow) denoting haemorrhage, and marked restriction on DWI (e) and ADC map (f). The gross examination of the specimen revealed a heterogeneous endometrial mass invading the myometrium and reaching the cervix denoting aggressive growth