- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Posterior Compartment
- •2.2 Anterior Compartment
- •2.3 Middle Compartment
- •2.4 Perineal Body
- •3 Compartments
- •3.1 Posterior Compartment
- •3.1.1 Connective Tissue Structures
- •3.1.2 Muscles
- •3.1.3 Reinterpreted Anatomy and Clinical Relevance
- •3.2 Anterior Compartment
- •3.2.1 Connective Tissue Structures
- •3.2.2 Muscles
- •3.2.3 Reinterpreted Anatomy and Clinical Relevance
- •3.2.4 Important Vessels, Nerves, and Lymphatics of the Anterior Compartment
- •3.3 Middle Compartment
- •3.3.1 Connective Tissue Structures
- •3.3.2 Muscles
- •3.3.3 Reinterpreted Anatomy and Clinical Relevance
- •3.3.4 Important Vessels, Nerves, and Lymphatics of the Middle Compartment
- •4 Perineal Body
- •References
- •MR and CT Techniques
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2.1 Spasmolytic Medication
- •2.3.2 Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
- •2.3.3 Dynamic Contrast Enhancement
- •3 CT Technique
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Technical Disadvantages
- •3.4 Oral and Rectal Contrast
- •References
- •Uterus: Normal Findings
- •1 Introduction
- •References
- •1 Clinical Background
- •1.1 Epidemiology
- •1.2 Clinical Presentation
- •1.3 Embryology
- •1.4 Pathology
- •2 Imaging
- •2.1 Technique
- •2.2.1 Class I Anomalies: Dysgenesis
- •2.2.2 Class II Anomalies: Unicornuate Uterus
- •2.2.3 Class III Anomalies: Uterus Didelphys
- •2.2.4 Class IV Anomalies: Bicornuate Uterus
- •2.2.5 Class V Anomalies: Septate Uterus
- •2.2.6 Class VI Anomalies: Arcuate Uterus
- •2.2.7 Class VII Anomalies
- •References
- •Benign Uterine Lesions
- •1 Background
- •1.1 Uterine Leiomyomas
- •1.1.1 Epidemiology
- •1.1.2 Pathogenesis
- •1.1.3 Histopathology
- •1.1.4 Clinical Presentation
- •1.1.5 Therapy
- •1.1.5.1 Indications
- •1.1.5.2 Medical Therapy and Ablation
- •1.1.5.3 Surgical Therapy
- •1.1.5.4 Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE)
- •1.1.5.5 Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound
- •2 Adenomyosis of the Uterus
- •2.1 Epidemiology
- •2.2 Pathogenesis
- •2.3 Histopathology
- •2.4 Clinical Presentation
- •2.5 Therapy
- •3 Imaging
- •3.2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •3.2.1 Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Technique
- •3.2.2 MR Appearance of Uterine Leiomyomas
- •3.2.3 Locations, Growth Patterns, and Imaging Characteristics
- •3.2.4 Histologic Subtypes and Forms of Degeneration
- •3.2.5 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.2.6 MR Appearance of Uterine Adenomyosis
- •3.2.7 Locations, Growth Patterns, and Imaging Characteristics
- •3.2.8 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.3 Computed Tomography
- •3.3.1 CT Technique
- •3.3.2 CT Appearance of Uterine Leiomyoma and Adenomyosis
- •3.3.3 Atypical Appearances on CT and Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1 Indications
- •4.2 Technique
- •Bibliography
- •Cervical Cancer
- •1 Background
- •1.1 Epidemiology
- •1.2 Pathogenesis
- •1.3 Screening
- •1.4 HPV Vaccination
- •1.5 Clinical Presentation
- •1.6 Histopathology
- •1.7 Staging
- •1.8 Growth Patterns
- •1.9 Treatment
- •1.9.1 Treatment of Microinvasive Cervical Cancer
- •1.9.2 Treatment of Grossly Invasive Cervical Carcinoma (FIGO IB-IVA)
- •1.9.3 Treatment of Recurrent Disease
- •1.9.4 Treatment of Cervical Cancer During Pregnancy
- •1.10 Prognosis
- •2 Imaging
- •2.1 Indications
- •2.1.1 Role of CT and MRI
- •2.2 Imaging Technique
- •2.2.2 Dynamic MRI
- •2.2.3 Coil Technique
- •2.2.4 Vaginal Opacification
- •2.3 Staging
- •2.3.1 General MR Appearance
- •2.3.2 Rare Histologic Types
- •2.3.3 Tumor Size
- •2.3.4 Local Staging
- •2.3.4.1 Stage IA
- •2.3.4.2 Stage IB
- •2.3.4.3 Stage IIA
- •2.3.4.4 Stage IIB
- •2.3.4.5 Stage IIIA
- •2.3.4.6 Stage IIIB
- •2.3.4.7 Stage IVA
- •2.3.4.8 Stage IVB
- •2.3.5 Lymph Node Staging
- •2.3.6 Distant Metastases
- •2.4 Specific Diagnostic Queries
- •2.4.1 Preoperative Imaging
- •2.4.2 Imaging Before Radiotherapy
- •2.5 Follow-Up
- •2.5.1 Findings After Surgery
- •2.5.2 Findings After Chemotherapy
- •2.5.3 Findings After Radiotherapy
- •2.5.4 Recurrent Cervical Cancer
- •2.6.1 Ultrasound
- •2.7.1 Metastasis
- •2.7.2 Malignant Melanoma
- •2.7.3 Lymphoma
- •2.8 Benign Lesions of the Cervix
- •2.8.1 Nabothian Cyst
- •2.8.2 Leiomyoma
- •2.8.3 Polyps
- •2.8.4 Rare Benign Tumors
- •2.8.5 Cervicitis
- •2.8.6 Endometriosis
- •2.8.7 Ectopic Cervical Pregnancy
- •References
- •Endometrial Cancer
- •1.1 Epidemiology
- •1.2 Pathology and Risk Factors
- •1.3 Symptoms and Diagnosis
- •2 Endometrial Cancer Staging
- •2.1 MR Protocol for Staging Endometrial Carcinoma
- •2.2.1 Stage I Disease
- •2.2.2 Stage II Disease
- •2.2.3 Stage III Disease
- •2.2.4 Stage IV Disease
- •4 Therapeutic Approaches
- •4.1 Surgery
- •4.2 Adjuvant Treatment
- •4.3 Fertility-Sparing Treatment
- •5.1 Treatment of Recurrence
- •6 Prognosis
- •References
- •Uterine Sarcomas
- •1 Epidemiology
- •2 Pathology
- •2.1 Smooth Muscle Tumours
- •2.2 Endometrial Stromal Tumours
- •3 Clinical Background
- •4 Staging
- •5 Imaging
- •5.1 Leiomyosarcoma
- •5.2.3 Undifferentiated Uterine Sarcoma
- •5.3 Adenosarcoma
- •6 Prognosis and Treatment
- •References
- •1.1 Anatomical Relationships
- •1.4 Pelvic Fluid
- •2 Developmental Anomalies
- •2.1 Congenital Abnormalities
- •2.2 Ovarian Maldescent
- •3 Ovarian Transposition
- •References
- •1 Introduction
- •4 Benign Adnexal Lesions
- •4.1.1 Physiological Ovarian Cysts: Follicular and Corpus Luteum Cysts
- •4.1.1.1 Imaging Findings in Physiological Ovarian Cysts
- •4.1.1.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1.2 Paraovarian Cysts
- •4.1.2.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.1.2.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1.3 Peritoneal Inclusion Cysts
- •4.1.3.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.1.3.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1.4 Theca Lutein Cysts
- •4.1.4.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.1.4.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1.5 Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
- •4.1.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.1.5.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.2.1 Cystadenoma
- •4.2.1.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.2.1.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.2.2 Cystadenofibroma
- •4.2.2.1 Imaging Features
- •4.2.3 Mature Teratoma
- •4.2.3.1 Mature Cystic Teratoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •4.2.3.2 Monodermal Teratoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •4.2.4 Benign Sex Cord-Stromal Tumors
- •4.2.4.1 Fibroma and Thecoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •4.2.4.2 Sclerosing Stromal Tumor
- •Imaging Findings
- •4.2.5 Brenner Tumors
- •4.2.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.2.5.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •5 Functioning Ovarian Tumors
- •References
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Context
- •2.2.2 Indications According to Simple Rules
- •References
- •CT and MRI in Ovarian Carcinoma
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Familial or Hereditary Ovarian Cancers
- •3 Screening for Ovarian Cancer
- •5 Tumor Markers
- •6 Clinical Presentation
- •7 Imaging of Ovarian Cancer
- •7.1.2 Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- •7.1.3 Ascites
- •7.3 Staging of Ovarian Cancer
- •7.3.1 Staging by CT and MRI
- •Imaging Findings According to Tumor Stages
- •Value of Imaging
- •7.3.2 Prediction of Resectability
- •7.4 Tumor Types
- •7.4.1 Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
- •High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
- •Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
- •Mucinous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
- •Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinomas
- •Clear Cell Carcinomas
- •Imaging Findings of Epithelial Ovarian Cancers
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Borderline Tumors
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Value of Imaging
- •Malignant Germ Cell Tumors
- •Dysgerminomas
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Immature Teratomas
- •Imaging Findings
- •Malignant Transformation in Benign Teratoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Sex-Cord Stromal Tumors
- •Granulosa Cell Tumors
- •Imaging Findings
- •Sertoli-Leydig Cell Tumor
- •Imaging Findings
- •Ovarian Lymphoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •7.4.3 Ovarian Metastases
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •7.5 Fallopian Tube Cancer
- •7.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •References
- •Endometriosis
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Sonography
- •3 MR Imaging Findings
- •References
- •Vagina and Vulva
- •1 Introduction
- •3.1 CT Appearance
- •3.2 MRI Protocol
- •3.3 MRI Appearance
- •4.1 Imperforate Hymen
- •4.2 Congenital Vaginal Septa
- •4.3 Vaginal Agenesis
- •5.1 Vaginal Cysts
- •5.1.1 Gardner Duct Cyst (Mesonephric Cyst)
- •5.1.2 Bartholin Gland Cyst
- •5.2.1 Vaginal Infections
- •5.2.1.1 Vulvar Infections
- •5.2.1.2 Vulvar Thrombophlebitis
- •5.3 Vulvar Trauma
- •5.4 Vaginal Fistula
- •5.5 Post-Radiation Changes
- •5.6 Benign Tumors
- •6.1 Vaginal Malignancies
- •6.1.1 Primary Vaginal Carcinoma
- •6.1.1.1 MRI Findings
- •6.1.1.2 Lymph Node Drainage
- •6.1.1.3 Recurrence and Complications
- •6.1.2 Non-squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Vagina
- •6.1.2.1 Adenocarcinoma
- •6.1.2.2 Melanoma
- •6.1.2.3 Sarcomas
- •6.1.2.4 Lymphoma
- •6.2 Vulvar Malignancies
- •6.2.1 Vulvar Carcinoma
- •6.2.2 Melanoma
- •6.2.3 Lymphoma
- •6.2.4 Aggressive Angiomyxoma of the Vulva
- •7 Vaginal Cuff Disease
- •7.1 MRI Findings
- •8 Foreign Bodies
- •References
- •Imaging of Lymph Nodes
- •1 Background
- •3 Technique
- •3.1.1 Intravenous Unspecific Contrast Agents
- •3.1.2 Intravenous Tissue-Specific Contrast Agents
- •References
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.1.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.1.3 Value of Imaging
- •2.2 Pelvic Inflammatory
- •2.2.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.3 Hydropyosalpinx
- •2.3.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.3.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.4 Tubo-ovarian Abscess
- •2.4.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.4.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.4.3 Value of Imaging
- •2.5 Ovarian Torsion
- •2.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.5.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.5.3 Diagnostic Value
- •2.6 Ectopic Pregnancy
- •2.6.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.6.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.6.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.1 Pelvic Congestion Syndrome
- •3.1.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.1.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.1.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.2 Ovarian Vein Thrombosis
- •3.2.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.2.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.2.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.3 Appendicitis
- •3.3.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.3.2 Value of Imaging
- •3.4 Diverticulitis
- •3.4.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.4.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.4.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.5 Epiploic Appendagitis
- •3.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.5.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.5.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.6 Crohn’s Disease
- •3.6.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.6.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.6.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.7 Rectus Sheath Hematoma
- •3.7.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.7.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.7.3 Value of Imaging
- •References
- •MRI of the Pelvic Floor
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Imaging Techniques
- •3.1 Indications
- •3.2 Patient Preparation
- •3.3 Patient Instruction
- •3.4 Patient Positioning
- •3.5 Organ Opacification
- •3.6 Sequence Protocols
- •4 MR Image Analysis
- •4.1 Bony Pelvis
- •5 Typical Findings
- •5.1 Anterior Compartment
- •5.2 Middle Compartment
- •5.3 Posterior Compartment
- •5.4 Levator Ani Muscle
- •References
- •Evaluation of Infertility
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Imaging Techniques
- •2.1 Hysterosalpingography
- •2.1.1 Cycle Considerations
- •2.1.2 Technical Considerations
- •2.1.3 Side Effects and Complications
- •2.1.5 Pathological Findings
- •2.1.6 Limitations of HSG
- •2.2.1 Cycle Considerations
- •2.2.2 Technical Considerations
- •2.2.2.1 Normal and Abnormal Anatomy
- •2.2.3 Accuracy
- •2.2.4 Side Effects and Complications
- •2.2.5 Limitations of Sono-HSG
- •2.3 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •2.3.1 Indications
- •2.3.2 Technical Considerations
- •2.3.3 Limitations
- •3 Ovulatory Dysfunction
- •4 Pituitary Adenoma
- •5 Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome
- •7 Uterine Disorders
- •7.1 Müllerian Duct Anomalies
- •7.1.1 Class I: Hypoplasia or Agenesis
- •7.1.2 Class II: Unicornuate
- •7.1.3 Class III: Didelphys
- •7.1.4 Class IV: Bicornuate
- •7.1.5 Class V: Septate
- •7.1.6 Class VI: Arcuate
- •7.1.7 Class VII: Diethylstilbestrol Related
- •7.2 Adenomyosis
- •7.3 Leiomyoma
- •7.4 Endometriosis
- •References
- •MR Pelvimetry
- •1 Clinical Background
- •1.3.1 Diagnosis
- •1.3.2.1 Cephalopelvic Disproportion
- •1.3.4 Inadequate Progression of Labor due to Inefficient Contraction (“the Powers”)
- •2.2 Palpation of the Pelvis
- •3 MR Pelvimetry
- •3.2 MR Imaging Protocol
- •3.3 Image Analysis
- •3.4 Reference Values for MR Pelvimetry
- •5 Indications for Pelvimetry
- •References
- •MR Imaging of the Placenta
- •2 Imaging of the Placenta
- •3 MRI Protocol
- •4 Normal Appearance
- •4.1 Placenta Variants
- •5 Placenta Adhesive Disorders
- •6 Placenta Abruption
- •7 Solid Placental Masses
- •9 Future Directions
- •References
- •Erratum to: Endometrial Cancer
98 |
T.J. Kröncke |
|
|
early enhanced scans, while large polyps exhibit a heterogeneous enhancement pattern (Hricak et al. 1992; Grasel et al. 2000). Submucosal leiomyomas are best distinguished from endometrial polyps by their rather spherical shape, their obvious connection to the myometrium, and lower signal intensity on T2-weighted images.
Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is a rare tumor that accounts for approximately 1% of all uterine malignancies and contributes to nearly 70% of all uterine sarcomas. The incidence of uterine LMS is 1.5–3 per 100.000 women (Brooks et al. 2004). Most occur in women over 40 years of age, with incidence increasing after age 50. They are predominantly observed in older women (sixth decade of life) as compared to women with leiomyoma (fourth decade of life) (Rammeh-Rommani et al. 2005). It is felt that leiomyosarcomas arise de novo and may be unrelated to benign leiomyomas (Levy et al. 2000). While rapid growth is not an indicator of malignancy in premenopausal women, it is always suspicious in postmenopausal women, although not specific (Parker et al. 1994; Okamoto et al. 2004). The imaging appearance does not enable reliable differentiation of leiomyosarcoma from benign leiomyoma (Parker et al. 1994; Schwartz et al. 1998; Janus et al. 1989; Takemori et al. 1992). Besides frank signs of invasiveness or metastatic disease, an irregular contour, nodular borders, inhomogeneous appearance with pockets of high signal intensity on T2, T2 “dark” area in a myometrial mass, hemorrhagic changes with high signal intensity on T1, as well as presence of central unenhanced areas have been demonstrated to be MR features indicative of a leiomyosarcoma rather than a leiomyoma (Goto et al. 2002; Schwartz et al. 1998; Sahdev et al. 2001; Pattani et al. 1995; Lakhman et al. 2017). Early enhancement on dynamic scans after administration of contrast medium together with serum determination of LDH and its isoenzyme was reported to be highly sensitive and specific in differentiating leiomyosarcoma from degenerated leiomyoma (Goto et al. 2002). The mean ADC value in leiomyosarcomas has been reported to be significantly lower than in degenerated leiomyomas (Li et al. 2016).
3.2.6\ MR Appearance of Uterine Adenomyosis
Adenomyosis of the uterus is diagnosed on T2-weighted images where it is characterized by
Fig. 23 Focal adenomyosis of the uterus. T2-weighted sagittal image of a patient with focal adenomyosis of the uterus. There is enlargement with only mild deformity of the uterus. The fundus and posterior uterine wall is thickened due to marked broadening of the junctional zone. Hyperintense foci are seen within the lesion (reproduced with permission from reference 840, Kröncke TJ, Hamm B (2003) Role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in establishing the indication for planning and following up uterine artery embolization (UAE) for treating symptomatic leiomyomas of the uterus [article in German]. Radiologe 43:624–633)
ill-defined low-signal-intensity areas representing diffuse or focal broadening of the junctional zone as a result of smooth muscle hyperplasia associated with heterotopic endometrial glands (Reinhold et al. 1996; Outwater et al. 1998). A junctional zone thickness of ≥12 mm (Fig. 23) is the threshold for which a high degree of accuracy in the diagnosis of adenomyosis has been reported (Reinhold et al. 1998; Kang et al. 1996). Adenomyosis can be excluded if the junctional zone thickness is 8 mm or less (Reinhold et al. 1996). Bright foci and cyst-like inclusions may be seen on T2-weighted images in up to 50% of patients and represent heterotopic endometrial glands, cystic dilatations, or hemorrhagic foci (Reinhold et al. 1996; Togashi et al. 1989). Corresponding high signal on T1-weighted images is less frequently observed but highly
Benign Uterine Lesions |
99 |
|
|
suggestive of adenomyosis (Fig. 24). Additionally, striations of high signal intensity extending from the endometrium into the myometrium as a result of direct invasion of the myometrium may be seen and result in pseudo-widening of the endome-
trium (Reinhold et al. 1999). These high-signal- intensity changes associated with adenomyosis may fluctuate during the menstrual cycle. The MR imaging signs of adenomyosis are summarized in Table 2.
a |
b |
Fig. 24 MRI of diffuse adenomyosis of the uterus. (a) T2-weighted transaxial image of a patient with diffuse adenomyosis of the uterus. The uterine wall is thickened, there is poor definition of the endomyometrial junction, and the junctional zones blend with the myometrium. No focal mass is present. Cyst-like inclusions of hyperintense
Table 2 MRI criteria for adenomyosis
signal intensity are present (arrow). (b) Corresponding fat-suppressed T1-weighted transaxial image showing hyperintense spots within the myometrium indicating fresh blood related to the dislocated endometrial glands (arrows)
Location |
• Focal or diffuse widening of junctional zone (JZ) > 12 mm |
|
|
|
• More often found in the posterior uterine wall |
|
|
|
• Not seen in the cervix |
|
• Seldom seen as focal lesion without contact to JZ (adenomyoma) |
Morphology |
• Either diffusely involving the uterus or presenting as a lesion with ill-defined margins |
|
blending with the surrounding myometrium |
|
• Poor definition of endomyometrial junction |
|
• If focal, may be globular, elliptical but usually not round, spherical |
|
• Significant mass effect missing, even if large lesion present |
|
|
|
• Mild distortion of endometrium but marked enlargement of the uterus in diffuse adenomyosis |
|
|
|
• Adenomyoma may rarely present as round lesion located away from JZ |
|
• Lesion may include large cystic areas (cystic adenomyosis) |
Appearance on |
• Mostly isointense to the myometrium |
T1 |
|
• May show hyperintense foci corresponding to small areas of hemorrhage |
|
|
|
Appearance on |
• Low SI uterine lesion with or without punctuate high SI foci scattered throughout the lesion |
T2 |
or high SI linear striations extending from the edometrium that may lead to a pseudo- |
|
widening of the endometrium |
|
|
|
• High SI (micro) cysts may be seen (<5 mm) |
|
• Rarely large cystic spaces within a lesion (cystic adenomyosis) |
Appearance on |
• Can appear hypo-, iso-, and hyperintense relative to myometrium |
Gd-enhanced T1 |
|
• Perfusion abnormalities may be seen on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI |
|
|
|
Additional |
• No pseudocapsule |
findings |
• Adenomyosis frequently seen in combination with findings of endometriosis |
100 |
T.J. Kröncke |
|
|
3.2.7\ Locations, Growth Patterns, and Imaging Characteristics
Uterine adenomyosis is found more often in the posterior than in the anterior wall of the uterus and the fundus (Byun et al. 1999). Adenomyosis does not involve the cervix uteri. A focal type can be differentiated from a diffuse type of thickening of the junctional zone. Diffuse adenomyosis (Fig. 25) may lead to a markedly enlarged uterus with a surprisingly small or disproportional mass effect on the uterine contour and cavity. Focal adenomyosis (Fig. 26) manifests as an oval or a round lesion which leads to thickening of the uterine wall but differs from leiomyoma in that there is only little distortion of the uterine cavity or serosal surface. The lesion shows poorly defined margins and blends with surrounding myometrium. It lacks the pseudocapsule that may be seen with uterine leiomyoma. Signal voids at the periphery of the lesion are rare in focal adenomyosis (Byun et al. 1999). Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imaging does not increase the accuracy in diagnosing
Fig. 25 MRI of diffuse adenomyosis of the uterus. T2-weighted sagittal image of the uterus. A broadened junctional zone (>12 mm) is seen with poor definition of the endomyometrial junction. The junctional zone blends with the myometrium
Fig. 26 MRI of focal adenomyosis of the uterus. T2-weighted sagittal image of the uterus. The posterior wall of the uterus is thickened and a focally broadened junctional zone with hyperintense foci appearing as a globular lesion is seen (arrow). The uterus is enlarged but no mass effect is seen
adenomyosis of the uterus although perfusion abnormalities may be seen (Hricak et al. 1992). Unusual growth patterns include adenomyoma of the uterus which represents a localized form that manifests as a myometrial or subserosal mass without a direct connection to the junctional zone (Gilks et al. 2000; Tamai et al. 2005). Another rare variant is cystic adenomyosis which is thought to result from extensive hemorrhage within adenomyotic implants, leading to a well-circumscribed cystic myometrial lesion which may show different stages of blood product degradation such as a low-intensity rim on T2-weighted images corresponding to hemosiderin and areas of high signal intensity on T1-weighted images representing fresh blood (Reinhold et al. 1999; Tamai et al. 2005; Troiano et al. 1998). Treatment of adenomyosis by GnRH agonists may also alter its appearance on MR imaging and a decrease in junctional zone thickness and a better lesion demarcation may be observed (Imaoka et al. 2002).