- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Posterior Compartment
- •2.2 Anterior Compartment
- •2.3 Middle Compartment
- •2.4 Perineal Body
- •3 Compartments
- •3.1 Posterior Compartment
- •3.1.1 Connective Tissue Structures
- •3.1.2 Muscles
- •3.1.3 Reinterpreted Anatomy and Clinical Relevance
- •3.2 Anterior Compartment
- •3.2.1 Connective Tissue Structures
- •3.2.2 Muscles
- •3.2.3 Reinterpreted Anatomy and Clinical Relevance
- •3.2.4 Important Vessels, Nerves, and Lymphatics of the Anterior Compartment
- •3.3 Middle Compartment
- •3.3.1 Connective Tissue Structures
- •3.3.2 Muscles
- •3.3.3 Reinterpreted Anatomy and Clinical Relevance
- •3.3.4 Important Vessels, Nerves, and Lymphatics of the Middle Compartment
- •4 Perineal Body
- •References
- •MR and CT Techniques
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2.1 Spasmolytic Medication
- •2.3.2 Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
- •2.3.3 Dynamic Contrast Enhancement
- •3 CT Technique
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Technical Disadvantages
- •3.4 Oral and Rectal Contrast
- •References
- •Uterus: Normal Findings
- •1 Introduction
- •References
- •1 Clinical Background
- •1.1 Epidemiology
- •1.2 Clinical Presentation
- •1.3 Embryology
- •1.4 Pathology
- •2 Imaging
- •2.1 Technique
- •2.2.1 Class I Anomalies: Dysgenesis
- •2.2.2 Class II Anomalies: Unicornuate Uterus
- •2.2.3 Class III Anomalies: Uterus Didelphys
- •2.2.4 Class IV Anomalies: Bicornuate Uterus
- •2.2.5 Class V Anomalies: Septate Uterus
- •2.2.6 Class VI Anomalies: Arcuate Uterus
- •2.2.7 Class VII Anomalies
- •References
- •Benign Uterine Lesions
- •1 Background
- •1.1 Uterine Leiomyomas
- •1.1.1 Epidemiology
- •1.1.2 Pathogenesis
- •1.1.3 Histopathology
- •1.1.4 Clinical Presentation
- •1.1.5 Therapy
- •1.1.5.1 Indications
- •1.1.5.2 Medical Therapy and Ablation
- •1.1.5.3 Surgical Therapy
- •1.1.5.4 Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE)
- •1.1.5.5 Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound
- •2 Adenomyosis of the Uterus
- •2.1 Epidemiology
- •2.2 Pathogenesis
- •2.3 Histopathology
- •2.4 Clinical Presentation
- •2.5 Therapy
- •3 Imaging
- •3.2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •3.2.1 Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Technique
- •3.2.2 MR Appearance of Uterine Leiomyomas
- •3.2.3 Locations, Growth Patterns, and Imaging Characteristics
- •3.2.4 Histologic Subtypes and Forms of Degeneration
- •3.2.5 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.2.6 MR Appearance of Uterine Adenomyosis
- •3.2.7 Locations, Growth Patterns, and Imaging Characteristics
- •3.2.8 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.3 Computed Tomography
- •3.3.1 CT Technique
- •3.3.2 CT Appearance of Uterine Leiomyoma and Adenomyosis
- •3.3.3 Atypical Appearances on CT and Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1 Indications
- •4.2 Technique
- •Bibliography
- •Cervical Cancer
- •1 Background
- •1.1 Epidemiology
- •1.2 Pathogenesis
- •1.3 Screening
- •1.4 HPV Vaccination
- •1.5 Clinical Presentation
- •1.6 Histopathology
- •1.7 Staging
- •1.8 Growth Patterns
- •1.9 Treatment
- •1.9.1 Treatment of Microinvasive Cervical Cancer
- •1.9.2 Treatment of Grossly Invasive Cervical Carcinoma (FIGO IB-IVA)
- •1.9.3 Treatment of Recurrent Disease
- •1.9.4 Treatment of Cervical Cancer During Pregnancy
- •1.10 Prognosis
- •2 Imaging
- •2.1 Indications
- •2.1.1 Role of CT and MRI
- •2.2 Imaging Technique
- •2.2.2 Dynamic MRI
- •2.2.3 Coil Technique
- •2.2.4 Vaginal Opacification
- •2.3 Staging
- •2.3.1 General MR Appearance
- •2.3.2 Rare Histologic Types
- •2.3.3 Tumor Size
- •2.3.4 Local Staging
- •2.3.4.1 Stage IA
- •2.3.4.2 Stage IB
- •2.3.4.3 Stage IIA
- •2.3.4.4 Stage IIB
- •2.3.4.5 Stage IIIA
- •2.3.4.6 Stage IIIB
- •2.3.4.7 Stage IVA
- •2.3.4.8 Stage IVB
- •2.3.5 Lymph Node Staging
- •2.3.6 Distant Metastases
- •2.4 Specific Diagnostic Queries
- •2.4.1 Preoperative Imaging
- •2.4.2 Imaging Before Radiotherapy
- •2.5 Follow-Up
- •2.5.1 Findings After Surgery
- •2.5.2 Findings After Chemotherapy
- •2.5.3 Findings After Radiotherapy
- •2.5.4 Recurrent Cervical Cancer
- •2.6.1 Ultrasound
- •2.7.1 Metastasis
- •2.7.2 Malignant Melanoma
- •2.7.3 Lymphoma
- •2.8 Benign Lesions of the Cervix
- •2.8.1 Nabothian Cyst
- •2.8.2 Leiomyoma
- •2.8.3 Polyps
- •2.8.4 Rare Benign Tumors
- •2.8.5 Cervicitis
- •2.8.6 Endometriosis
- •2.8.7 Ectopic Cervical Pregnancy
- •References
- •Endometrial Cancer
- •1.1 Epidemiology
- •1.2 Pathology and Risk Factors
- •1.3 Symptoms and Diagnosis
- •2 Endometrial Cancer Staging
- •2.1 MR Protocol for Staging Endometrial Carcinoma
- •2.2.1 Stage I Disease
- •2.2.2 Stage II Disease
- •2.2.3 Stage III Disease
- •2.2.4 Stage IV Disease
- •4 Therapeutic Approaches
- •4.1 Surgery
- •4.2 Adjuvant Treatment
- •4.3 Fertility-Sparing Treatment
- •5.1 Treatment of Recurrence
- •6 Prognosis
- •References
- •Uterine Sarcomas
- •1 Epidemiology
- •2 Pathology
- •2.1 Smooth Muscle Tumours
- •2.2 Endometrial Stromal Tumours
- •3 Clinical Background
- •4 Staging
- •5 Imaging
- •5.1 Leiomyosarcoma
- •5.2.3 Undifferentiated Uterine Sarcoma
- •5.3 Adenosarcoma
- •6 Prognosis and Treatment
- •References
- •1.1 Anatomical Relationships
- •1.4 Pelvic Fluid
- •2 Developmental Anomalies
- •2.1 Congenital Abnormalities
- •2.2 Ovarian Maldescent
- •3 Ovarian Transposition
- •References
- •1 Introduction
- •4 Benign Adnexal Lesions
- •4.1.1 Physiological Ovarian Cysts: Follicular and Corpus Luteum Cysts
- •4.1.1.1 Imaging Findings in Physiological Ovarian Cysts
- •4.1.1.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1.2 Paraovarian Cysts
- •4.1.2.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.1.2.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1.3 Peritoneal Inclusion Cysts
- •4.1.3.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.1.3.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1.4 Theca Lutein Cysts
- •4.1.4.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.1.4.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1.5 Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
- •4.1.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.1.5.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.2.1 Cystadenoma
- •4.2.1.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.2.1.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.2.2 Cystadenofibroma
- •4.2.2.1 Imaging Features
- •4.2.3 Mature Teratoma
- •4.2.3.1 Mature Cystic Teratoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •4.2.3.2 Monodermal Teratoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •4.2.4 Benign Sex Cord-Stromal Tumors
- •4.2.4.1 Fibroma and Thecoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •4.2.4.2 Sclerosing Stromal Tumor
- •Imaging Findings
- •4.2.5 Brenner Tumors
- •4.2.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.2.5.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •5 Functioning Ovarian Tumors
- •References
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Context
- •2.2.2 Indications According to Simple Rules
- •References
- •CT and MRI in Ovarian Carcinoma
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Familial or Hereditary Ovarian Cancers
- •3 Screening for Ovarian Cancer
- •5 Tumor Markers
- •6 Clinical Presentation
- •7 Imaging of Ovarian Cancer
- •7.1.2 Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- •7.1.3 Ascites
- •7.3 Staging of Ovarian Cancer
- •7.3.1 Staging by CT and MRI
- •Imaging Findings According to Tumor Stages
- •Value of Imaging
- •7.3.2 Prediction of Resectability
- •7.4 Tumor Types
- •7.4.1 Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
- •High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
- •Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
- •Mucinous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
- •Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinomas
- •Clear Cell Carcinomas
- •Imaging Findings of Epithelial Ovarian Cancers
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Borderline Tumors
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Value of Imaging
- •Malignant Germ Cell Tumors
- •Dysgerminomas
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Immature Teratomas
- •Imaging Findings
- •Malignant Transformation in Benign Teratoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Sex-Cord Stromal Tumors
- •Granulosa Cell Tumors
- •Imaging Findings
- •Sertoli-Leydig Cell Tumor
- •Imaging Findings
- •Ovarian Lymphoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •7.4.3 Ovarian Metastases
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •7.5 Fallopian Tube Cancer
- •7.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •References
- •Endometriosis
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Sonography
- •3 MR Imaging Findings
- •References
- •Vagina and Vulva
- •1 Introduction
- •3.1 CT Appearance
- •3.2 MRI Protocol
- •3.3 MRI Appearance
- •4.1 Imperforate Hymen
- •4.2 Congenital Vaginal Septa
- •4.3 Vaginal Agenesis
- •5.1 Vaginal Cysts
- •5.1.1 Gardner Duct Cyst (Mesonephric Cyst)
- •5.1.2 Bartholin Gland Cyst
- •5.2.1 Vaginal Infections
- •5.2.1.1 Vulvar Infections
- •5.2.1.2 Vulvar Thrombophlebitis
- •5.3 Vulvar Trauma
- •5.4 Vaginal Fistula
- •5.5 Post-Radiation Changes
- •5.6 Benign Tumors
- •6.1 Vaginal Malignancies
- •6.1.1 Primary Vaginal Carcinoma
- •6.1.1.1 MRI Findings
- •6.1.1.2 Lymph Node Drainage
- •6.1.1.3 Recurrence and Complications
- •6.1.2 Non-squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Vagina
- •6.1.2.1 Adenocarcinoma
- •6.1.2.2 Melanoma
- •6.1.2.3 Sarcomas
- •6.1.2.4 Lymphoma
- •6.2 Vulvar Malignancies
- •6.2.1 Vulvar Carcinoma
- •6.2.2 Melanoma
- •6.2.3 Lymphoma
- •6.2.4 Aggressive Angiomyxoma of the Vulva
- •7 Vaginal Cuff Disease
- •7.1 MRI Findings
- •8 Foreign Bodies
- •References
- •Imaging of Lymph Nodes
- •1 Background
- •3 Technique
- •3.1.1 Intravenous Unspecific Contrast Agents
- •3.1.2 Intravenous Tissue-Specific Contrast Agents
- •References
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.1.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.1.3 Value of Imaging
- •2.2 Pelvic Inflammatory
- •2.2.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.3 Hydropyosalpinx
- •2.3.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.3.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.4 Tubo-ovarian Abscess
- •2.4.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.4.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.4.3 Value of Imaging
- •2.5 Ovarian Torsion
- •2.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.5.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.5.3 Diagnostic Value
- •2.6 Ectopic Pregnancy
- •2.6.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.6.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.6.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.1 Pelvic Congestion Syndrome
- •3.1.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.1.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.1.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.2 Ovarian Vein Thrombosis
- •3.2.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.2.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.2.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.3 Appendicitis
- •3.3.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.3.2 Value of Imaging
- •3.4 Diverticulitis
- •3.4.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.4.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.4.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.5 Epiploic Appendagitis
- •3.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.5.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.5.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.6 Crohn’s Disease
- •3.6.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.6.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.6.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.7 Rectus Sheath Hematoma
- •3.7.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.7.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.7.3 Value of Imaging
- •References
- •MRI of the Pelvic Floor
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Imaging Techniques
- •3.1 Indications
- •3.2 Patient Preparation
- •3.3 Patient Instruction
- •3.4 Patient Positioning
- •3.5 Organ Opacification
- •3.6 Sequence Protocols
- •4 MR Image Analysis
- •4.1 Bony Pelvis
- •5 Typical Findings
- •5.1 Anterior Compartment
- •5.2 Middle Compartment
- •5.3 Posterior Compartment
- •5.4 Levator Ani Muscle
- •References
- •Evaluation of Infertility
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Imaging Techniques
- •2.1 Hysterosalpingography
- •2.1.1 Cycle Considerations
- •2.1.2 Technical Considerations
- •2.1.3 Side Effects and Complications
- •2.1.5 Pathological Findings
- •2.1.6 Limitations of HSG
- •2.2.1 Cycle Considerations
- •2.2.2 Technical Considerations
- •2.2.2.1 Normal and Abnormal Anatomy
- •2.2.3 Accuracy
- •2.2.4 Side Effects and Complications
- •2.2.5 Limitations of Sono-HSG
- •2.3 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •2.3.1 Indications
- •2.3.2 Technical Considerations
- •2.3.3 Limitations
- •3 Ovulatory Dysfunction
- •4 Pituitary Adenoma
- •5 Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome
- •7 Uterine Disorders
- •7.1 Müllerian Duct Anomalies
- •7.1.1 Class I: Hypoplasia or Agenesis
- •7.1.2 Class II: Unicornuate
- •7.1.3 Class III: Didelphys
- •7.1.4 Class IV: Bicornuate
- •7.1.5 Class V: Septate
- •7.1.6 Class VI: Arcuate
- •7.1.7 Class VII: Diethylstilbestrol Related
- •7.2 Adenomyosis
- •7.3 Leiomyoma
- •7.4 Endometriosis
- •References
- •MR Pelvimetry
- •1 Clinical Background
- •1.3.1 Diagnosis
- •1.3.2.1 Cephalopelvic Disproportion
- •1.3.4 Inadequate Progression of Labor due to Inefficient Contraction (“the Powers”)
- •2.2 Palpation of the Pelvis
- •3 MR Pelvimetry
- •3.2 MR Imaging Protocol
- •3.3 Image Analysis
- •3.4 Reference Values for MR Pelvimetry
- •5 Indications for Pelvimetry
- •References
- •MR Imaging of the Placenta
- •2 Imaging of the Placenta
- •3 MRI Protocol
- •4 Normal Appearance
- •4.1 Placenta Variants
- •5 Placenta Adhesive Disorders
- •6 Placenta Abruption
- •7 Solid Placental Masses
- •9 Future Directions
- •References
- •Erratum to: Endometrial Cancer
Endometrial Cancer |
|
195 |
|
|
|
a |
b |
e |
c |
d |
Fig. 16 Stage IB polypoid endometrioid carcinoma that distends the uterine cavity and causes myometrial thinning in a 68 year-old woman. (a) Axial T2-weighted image; (b) axial oblique 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted sequence after the administration of gadolinium in the equilibrium phase (120 s); (c) axial diffusion-weighted image (b = 1000 s/ mm2); (d) ADC map; (e) sagittal T2-weighted image. The
endometrial tumor is heterogeneous and shows both areas of hypointense and hyperintense signal relatively to the outer myometrium after administration of gadolinium in the equilibrium phase. This makes it difficult to assess myometrial invasion. Outer tumoral myometrial invasion in this thinned myometrium is better depicted in the diffusion-weighted image and in the respective ADC map (arrows)
Recent studies have shown that DWI-MR is significantly superior in the assessment of myometrial invasion when compared to DCE-MR (Bonatti et al. 2015; Rechichi et al. 2010; Takeuchi et al. 2009; Beddy et al. 2012).
A prospective study conducted by Rechichi et al. has concluded that DWI-MR is highly accurate in assessing the depth of myometrial invasion and perhaps it could replace DCE-MR as a complement to T2-weighted images in the preoperative evaluation of endometrial carcinoma (Rechichi et al. 2010). These findings were also supported by the study of Bonatti et al. that also stated that T2-weighted images and DWI could replace the combination of T2-weighted images and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images in the preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma (Bonatti et al. 2015).
Takeuchi and coworkers also reported an accuracy of 94 % for DWI and of 88 % for DCE-MR in the assessment of myometrial invasion (Takeuchi et al. 2009).
ADC maps have also shown to provide accurate measurement of the depth of myometrial invasion (Gallego et al. 2014).
Nonetheless, a recent meta-analysis assessing only nine studies showed that although DWI-MR has a slightly higher specificity in the diagnosis of myometrial invasion, DCE-MR and DWI-MR do not differ significantly in sensitivity and specificity in presurgical diagnosis of myometrial invasion (Andreano et al. 2014).
2.2.2\ Stage II Disease
Stage II disease is characterized by cervical stromal invasion (Pecorelli 2009).
In the majority of cases, T2-weighted images are helpful in diagnosing cervical stromal invasion by depicting a heterogeneous hyperintense tumor disrupting the hypointense cervical stroma (Manfredi et al. 2005).
Axial oblique plane of the cervix (perpendicular to the cervical canal) postcontrast injection 3D-reccaled echo fat-suppressed T1-weighted images in a late phase (≈80– 240 s) are also very useful in assessing cervical stromal invasion, as they show the disruption of cervical enhancement by the tumor (Fig. 17) (Tirumani et al. 2013; Haldorsen and Salvesen
196 |
M. Horta and T.M. Cunha |
|
|
a |
b |
Fig. 17 Stage II endometrioid carcinoma in an 83-year- old woman (a) sagittal T2-weighted image; (b) axial oblique plane of the cervix (perpendicular to the cervical canal) postcontrast injection 3D-reccaled echo fat-sup- pressed T1-weighted images in a late phase (4 min).
Sagittal T2-weighted image shows a voluminous endometrial tumor that prolapses in the cervical canal. The axial oblique plane of the cervix is very useful in detecting stromal invasion, especially after the administration of gadolinium in a late phase (4 min) (arrow)
a |
b |
c |
Fig. 18 Endometrial cancer prolapsed into the endocervical canal (a) Axial oblique plane of the cervix (perpendicular to the cervical canal) T2-weighted image: (b) sagittal T2-weighted image; (c) sagittal postcontrast injection 3D-reccaled echo fat-suppressed T1-weighted
images in the equilibrium phase (120 s). Both axial oblique and sagittal T2-weighted images raise the suspicion of cervical invasion. However, there is normal enhancement of the cervical epithelium without any disruption, which excludes stage II disease
2012; Seki et al. 2000). Normal enhancement of the cervical epithelium is present in tumors that project into the endocervical canal
but do not invade the cervical stroma (Fig. 18) (Tirumani et al. 2013; Haldorsen and Salvesen 2012).
Endometrial Cancer |
197 |
|
|
2.2.3\ Stage III Disease
Stage III disease is defined by local or regional spread of the tumor and it is subdivided into three substages (Pecorelli 2009).
In stage IIIA endometrial cancer, the tumor invades the serosa or/and the adnexa (Figs. 19 and 20).
Disruption of the serosal hypointense signal on T2-weighted images or loss of the enhancing myometrial outer margin on DCE-MR indicates serosal invasion (Fig. 19) (Tirumani et al. 2013; Manfredi et al. 2005).
The invasion of the ovaries may be due to direct extension via transmyometrial invasion or due to metastasis. Nodular foci in the adnexa are particularly frequent in type II endometrial can-
cer and in high-grade endometrioid carcinoma (Tirumani et al. 2013). DWI-MR is very useful in depicting these cases as well as pelvic peritoneal disease (Fig. 20) (Tirumani et al. 2013; Sala et al. 2010; Shen et al. 2008).
In stage IIIB disease, there is tumoral involvement of the parametria and/or the vagina by direct extension or by skip metastasis (Figs. 21, 22 and 23) (Pecorelli 2009). Images of the axial oblique plane of the cervix (perpendicular to the cervical canal) are very helpful in detecting parametrial invasion (Fig. 21). Detection of parametrial invasion is particularly important so surgeons can avoid perform a simple hysterectomy and thus perform a more extensive resection (Sala et al. 2013).
In stage IIIC endometrial cancer there is lymph node involvement (IIIC1 if there are positive pelvic lymph nodes and IIIC2 if there are positive paraaortic lymph nodes) (Fig. 24) (Pecorelli 2009).
MR sensitivity for detecting tumoral lymph node involvement is mostly low (Haldorsen and Salvesen 2012). The assessment of lymphadenopathies on MR imaging is still based on morphologic criteria (shortest axis diameter >10 mm) (Haldorsen and Salvesen 2012; Manfredi et al. 2004). DWI-MR helps detect lymph nodes, but there is a significant overlap with the ADC values of benign and malignant nodes (Nougaret et al. 2013; Nakai et al. 2008; Roy et al. 2010).
Fig. 19 Stage IIIA endometrioid carcinoma. (a) Axial oblique T2-weighted image shows disruption of the T2 hypointense serosal signal (dashed arrow) and tumoral invasion of the left ovary (arrow)
2.2.4\ Stage IV Disease
Stage IV endometrial cancers are subdivided in two substages: stage IVA if there is invasion of
a |
b |
c |
Fig. 20 Stage IIIA endometrioid carcinoma with subtle peritoneal nodules (a) axial T2-weighted image; (b) axial diffusion-weighted image (b = 1000 s/mm2); (c) ADC
map. Subtle peritoneal implants can be better depicted with diffusion-weighted images (arrow)
198 |
M. Horta and T.M. Cunha |
|
|
a |
b |
Fig. 21 Stage IIIB endometrioid carcinoma (a) sagittal T2-weighted image; (b) axial oblique plane of the cervix (perpendicular to the cervical canal) T2-weighted image. Parametrial invasion can be better depicted in the axial
oblique plane of the cervix, where disruption of the hypointense stromal signal can be seen as well as tumor extending to both parametria (arrows)
Fig. 22 Stage IIIB endometrioid carcinoma. (a) Sagittal T2-weighted image shows disruption of the T2 hypointense vaginal signal with invasion of the inferior third of the vagina (arrows)
the bladder or/and the bowel (Figs. 25 and 26); stage IVB if there are distant metastasis including abdominal metastasis and/or the presence of
positive inguinal lymph nodes or/and para-aortic nodes above the renal hila (Fig. 27) (Pecorelli 2009).
For an endometrial tumor to be considered as stage IVA, a lesion transgressing the hypointense T2-signal of the muscularis propria of the bladder and/or of the bowel must be clearly seen, as well as disrupting the hyperintense signal of the mucosa (Figs. 25 and 26) (Tirumani et al. 2013). Moreover, tumoral enhancement within the lumen should also be present (Figs. 25 and 26). This is particularly important in the differential diagnosis of bladder bullous edema (a sign of tumoral involvement of the bladder serosa and muscular layer, but not of the mucosa), since it is not considered stage IVA disease (Sala et al. 2013).
Although rare at presentation, distant hematogenous disease most commonly affects the liver, lungs, and bone (Fig. 27) (Numazaki et al. 2009).
In type 2 endometrial cancer, and in highgrade endometrioid endometrial cancer, stage IVB disease may present as in ovarian cancers with peritoneal carcinomatosis (Tirumani et al. 2013; Sala et al. 2013).
Endometrial Cancer |
199 |
|
|
a |
b |
d
c
Fig. 23 Stage IIIB endometrioid carcinoma in a 62-year- old woman with skip vaginal metastasis. (a) Sagittal T2-weighted image; (b) axial T2-weighted image; (c) axial diffusion-weighted image (b = 1000 s/mm2); (d)
ADC map. In the anterior lower third of the vagina a small lesion showing restricted diffusion can be seen (arrow). It was diagnosed as a vaginal metastasis
3\ Recent Advances
in Functional MR Imaging
in Assessing Endometrial
Carcinoma
In perfusion MR, repeated acquisitions of sequential images during the passage of gadolinium through the tumor are performed. Tumoral signal intensity versus time graphs and quantitative perfusion maps may be obtained, making it possible to evaluate microvascularity parameters
(Haldorsen and Salvesen 2012). The value of perfusion MR in assessing endometrial cancer is not yet established and validation studies are necessary to study its potential benefit.
Haldorsen et al. suggested that DCE-MRI may offer new information about the histological subtype and clinical course of endometrial carcinoma (Haldorsen et al. 2013). On the other hand, other studies regarding DCE-perfusion MR and tumor grading have shown contradictory results (Haldorsen et al. 2013; Ippolito et al. 2014a, b).
200 |
M. Horta and T.M. Cunha |
|
|
a |
b |
Fig. 24 Stage IIIC endometrial cancer (a) axial T2-weighted image shows pelvic lymphadenopathies (arrows) (stage IIIC1 disease); (b) axial T2-weighted
image shows para-aortic lymphadenopathies (dashed arrows) (Stage IIIC2 disease)
a |
b |
c |
d |
e |
Fig. 25 Stage IVA endometrioid carcinoma that invades the sigmoid colon in a 75-year-old woman. (a) Sagittal T2-weighted image; (b) sagittal 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted sequence after the administration of gadolinium in the equilibrium phase (120–180 s); (c) axial T2-weighted image; (d) axial diffusion-weighted image
(b = 1000 s/mm2); (e) ADC map. T2-weighted images show disruption of the hypointense signal of the sigmoid colon wall and mucosal invasion. There is tumoral enhancement within the lumen. The tumor shows also marked restricted diffusion, which can also be seen in the sigmoid lumen