Fig. 8  (a–d) MRI in a 34-year-old patient demonstrates an arcuate uterus. T2-weighted long-axis view of the uterus (a) shows a normal external uterine contour (arrowhead) and broad-based indentation of the endometrium.

References

Acién P (1997) Incidence of Müllerian defects in ­fertile and infertile women. Hum Reprod 12(7): 1372–1376

Ashton D, Amin HK, Richart RM, Neuwirth RS (1988) The incidence of asymptomatic uterine anomalies in women undergoing transcervical tubal sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 72(1):28–30

Sequential T2-weighted short-axis images (b–d) at the level where the two “horns” of the uterine cavity merge show no discernible fibrous septum

Behr SC, Courtier JL, Qayyum A (2012) Imaging of müllerian duct anomalies. Radiographics 32(6):E233–E250 Bermejo C, Martínez Ten P, Cantarero R et al (2010) Threedimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance

imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35(5):593–601 Brody JM, Koelliker SL, Frishman GN (1998) Unicornuate

uterus: imaging appearance, associated anomalies, and clinical implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171(5):1341–1347

Buttram VC, Gibbons WE (1979) Müllerian anomalies: a proposed classification. (An analysis of 144 cases). Fertil Steril 32(1):40–46

Byrne J, Nussbaum-Blask A, Taylor WS et al (2000) Prevalence of Müllerian duct anomalies detected at ultrasound. Am J Med Genet 94(1):9–12

Carrington BM, Hricak H, Nuruddin RN, Secaf E, Laros RK, Hill EC (1990) Müllerian duct anomalies: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 176(3):715–720

Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning N, Coomarasamy A (2011a) The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 17(6):761–771

Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Tan A, Thornton JG, Coomarasamy A, Raine-Fenning NJ (2011b) Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 38(4):371–382

Clifford K, Rai R, Watson H, Regan L (1994) An informative protocol for the investigation of recurrent miscarriage: preliminary experience of 500 consecutive cases. Hum Reprod 9(7):1328–1332

Dreisler E, Stampe SS (2014) Müllerian duct anomalies diagnosed by saline contrast sonohysterography: prevalence in a general population. Fertil Steril 102(2):525–529

Fedele L, Bianchi S (1995) Hysteroscopic metroplasty for septate uterus. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 22(3):473–489

Fedele L, Ferrazzi E, Dorta M, Vercellini P, Candiani GB (1988) Ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of "double" uteri. Fertil Steril 50(2):361–364

Fedele L, Dorta M, Brioschi D, Massari C, Candiani GB (1989) Magnetic resonance evaluation of double uteri. Obstet Gynecol 74(6):844–847

Fedele L, Bianchi S, Marchini M, Franchi D, Tozzi L, Dorta M (1996) Ultrastructural aspects of endometrium in infertile women with septate uterus. Fertil Steril 65(4):750–752

Goldberg JM, Falcone T, Attaran M (1997) Sonohysterographic evaluation of uterine abnormalities noted on hysterosalpingography. Hum Reprod 12(10):2151–2153

Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio SA et al (2013) The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod 28(8):2032–2044

Hatch EE, Palmer JR, Titus-Ernstoff L et al (1998) Cancer risk in women exposed to diethylstilbestrol in utero. JAMA 280(7):630–634

Herbst AL, Ulfelder H, Poskanzer DC (1971) Adenocarcinoma of the vagina. Association of ­maternal stilbestrol therapy with tumor appearance in young women. N Engl J Med 284(15):878–881

Homer HA, Li TC, Cooke ID (2000) The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril 73(1):1–14

Kaufman RH, Adam E, Hatch EE et al (2000) Continued follow-up of pregnancy outcomes in diethylstilbestrolexposed offspring. Obstet Gynecol 96(4):483–489

Krysiewicz S (1992) Infertility in women: diagnostic evaluation with hysterosalpingography and other imaging techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159(2):253–261

Ludwin A, Ludwin I (2015) Comparison of the ESHREESGE and ASRM classifications of Müllerian duct anomalies in everyday practice. Hum Reprod 30(3):569–580

Ma L, Wu G, Wang Y et al (2012) Fallopian tubal patency diagnosed by magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography. J Reprod Med 57(9–10):435–440

Minto CL, Hollings N, Hall-Craggs M, Creighton S (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of complex Müllerian anomalies. BJOG 108(8):791–797

Nahum GG (1998) Uterine anomalies. How common are they, and what is their distribution among subtypes? J Reprod Med 43(10):877–887

Olpin JD, Heilbrun M (2009) Imaging of Müllerian duct anomalies. Clin Obstet Gynecol 52(1):40–56

Pellerito JS, McCarthy SM, Doyle MB, Glickman MG, DeCherney AH (1992) Diagnosis of uterine anomalies:­ relative accuracy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography. Radiology 183(3):795–800

Pittock ST, Babovic-Vuksanovic D, Lteif A (2005) Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser anomaly and its associated malformations. Am J Med Genet A 135(3):314–316

Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, Bonilla-Musoles F, Simón C, Pellicer A (1997) Reproductive impact of congenital Müllerian anomalies. Hum Reprod 12(10):2277–2281 Raziel A, Arieli S, Bukovsky I, Caspi E, Golan A (1994) Investigation of the uterine cavity in recurrent abort-

ers. Fertil Steril 62(5):1080–1082

Rennell CL (1979) T-shaped uterus in diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure. AJR Am J Roentgenol 132(6):979–980

Reuter KL, Daly DC, Cohen SM (1989) Septate versus bicornuate uteri: errors in imaging diagnosis. Radiology 172(3):749–752

Robbins JB, Parry JP, Guite KM et al (2012) MRI of preg- nancy-related issues: müllerian duct anomalies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198(2):302–310

Rock JAAR (2000) Surgery to repair disorders of development. In: Nichols DHC-PD (ed) Gynecologic, obstetric and related surgery, 2nd edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 780–830

Rock JA, Schlaff WD (1985) The obstetric consequences of uterovaginal anomalies. Fertil Steril 43(5):681–692 Saleem SN (2003) MR imaging diagnosis of uterovaginal anomalies: current state of the art. Radiographics

23(5):e13

Simón C, Martinez L, Pardo F, Tortajada M, Pellicer A (1991) Müllerian defects in women with normal reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril 56(6):1192–1193

Steinkeler JA, Woodfield CA, Lazarus E, Hillstrom MM (2009) Female infertility: a systematic approach to radiologic imaging and diagnosis. Radiographics 29(5):1353–1370

Strübbe EH, Willemsen WN, Lemmens JA, Thijn CJ, Rolland R (1993) Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser

syndrome: distinction between two forms based on excretory urographic, sonographic, and laparoscopic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160(2):331–334

1988 The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 49(6):944–55.

Toaff ME, Lev-Toaff AS, Toaff R (1984) Communicating uteri: review and classification with introduction of two previously unreported types. Fertil Steril 41(5):661–679 Troiano RN, McCarthy SM (2004) Mullerian duct anomalies:

imaging and clinical issues. Radiology 233(1):19–34

Valle RF (1996) Hysteroscopic treatment of partial and complete uterine septum. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud 41(3):310–315

Winter L, Glücker T, Steimann S et al (2010) Feasibility of dynamic MR-hysterosalpingography for the diagnostic work-up of infertile women. Acta Radiol 51(6):693–701 Wu MH, Hsu CC, Huang KE (1997) Detection of congenital müllerian duct anomalies using three-dimensional

ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound 25(9):487–492

Zlopasa G, Skrablin S, Kalafatić D, Banović V, Lesin J (2007) Uterine anomalies and pregnancy outcome following resectoscope metroplasty. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 98(2):129–133