Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Joseph I. Goldstein, Dale E. Newbury [et al.]. Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis. (2017). (ISBN 978-1-4939-6674-5). (ISBN 978-1-4939-6676-9). (DOI 10.1007978-1-4939-6676-9).pdf
Скачиваний:
20
Добавлен:
11.04.2023
Размер:
68.34 Mб
Скачать

44\ Chapter 4 · X-Rays

. Table 4.1  Correspondence between the Siegbahn and IUPAC nomenclature protocols (restricted to characteristic X-rays observed

with energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry and photon energies from 100 eV to 25 keV)

 

Siegbahn

IUPAC

Siegbahn

IUPAC

Siegbahn

IUPAC

 

1

 

1

 

1

 

 

K-L3

L3-M5

M5-N7

 

2

K-L2

2

L3-M4

2

M5-N6

4

1

K-M3

1

L2-M4

M4-N6

2

K-N2,3

2

L3-N5

M3-N5

 

 

 

 

 

3

L1-M3

M4,5-N2,3

 

 

 

4

L1-M2

 

M3-N1

 

 

 

1

L2-N4

 

M2-N1

 

 

 

2

L1-N2

 

M3-N4,5

 

 

 

3

L1-N3

 

M3-O1

 

 

 

4

L1-O4

 

M3-O4,5

 

 

 

L2-M1

 

M2-N4

 

 

 

Ll

L3-M1

 

 

4.2.5\ X-Ray Weights ofLines

Within these families, the relative abundances of the characteristic X-rays are not equal. For example, for sodium the ratio of the K-L2,3 to K-M is approximately 150:1, and this ratio is a strong function of the atomic number, as shown in

. Fig. 4.5a for the K-shell (Heinrich et al. 1979). For the L-shell and M-shell, the X-ray families have more members, and the relative abundances are complex functions of atomic number, as shown in . Fig. 4.5b, c.

4.2.6\ Characteristic X-Ray Intensity

Isolated Atoms

When isolated atoms are considered, the probability of an energetic electron with energy E (keV) ionizing an atom by ejecting an atomic electron bound with ionization energy Ec (keV) can be expressed as a cross section, QI:

QI (ionizations / e(atom / cm2 ) )

= 6.51×1020

n b

/ E E log

e (

c E / E

c )

\

(4.4)

(

s s )

c

s

 

where ns is the number of electrons in the shell or subshell

(e.g., nK = 2), and bs and cs are constants for a given shell (e.g., bK = 0.35 and cK = 1) (Powell 1976). The behavior of the ionization cross section for the silicon K-shell as a function of the energy of the energetic beam electron is shown in

. Fig. 4.6. Starting with a zero value at 1.838 keV, the K-shell ionization energy for silicon, the cross section rapidly increases to a peak value, and then slowly decreases with further increases in the beam energy.

The relationship of the energy of the exciting electron to the ionization energy of the atomic electron is an important parameter and is designated the “overvoltage,” U:

U =E / Ec \

(4.5a)

The overvoltage that corresponds to the incident beam energy, E0, which is the maximum value because the beam electrons subsequently lose energy due to inelastic scattering as they progress through the specimen, is designated as U0:

U0 =E0 / Ec \

(4.5b)

For ionization to occur followed by X-ray emission, U > 1. With this definition for U, Eq. (4.4) can be rewritten as

QI (ionizations / e(atom / cm2 ) )

= 6.51×1020 (ns bs ) / U Ec

2

loge (csU )

\

(4.6)

 

 

 

 

The critical excitation energy is a strong function of the atomic number of the element and of the particular shell, as shown in . Fig. 4.7. Thus, for a specimen that consists of several different elements, the initial overvoltage U0 will be different for each element, which will affect the relative generation intensities of the different elements.

X-Ray Production in Thin Foils

Thin foils may be defined as having a thickness such that most electrons pass through the foil without suffering elastic scattering out of the ideal beam cylinder (defined by the circular beam footprint on the entrance and exit surfaces and the foil thickness) and without suffering significant

4.2 · Characteristic X-Rays

. Fig. 4.5a Relative abundance of the K-L2,3 to K-M (Kα to Kβ) (Heinrich et al. 1979). b Relative abundance of

the L-shell X-rays, L3-M4,5 (Lα1,2) = 1 (Crawford et al. 2011). c Relative abundance of the M-shell X-rays, M5-N6,7

(Mα) = 1 (Crawford et al. 2011)

45

 

4

 

 

 

a

 

 

 

K-shell weights of lines (Heinrich et al., 1979)

 

 

0.14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

+Kβ)

0.08

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kβ/(Kα

0.06

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.04

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.02

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

15

20

25

30

35

 

 

 

 

 

Atomic number(Z)

 

 

 

 

b

 

L-shell weights of lines [relative to L3-M4,5 (Lα1,2) = 1]

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

of lines

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

weights

 

0.01

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Relative

 

 

 

 

 

L3-M1 (L )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

L2-M1 (Lη)

 

 

 

 

0.001

 

 

 

L2-M4 (Lβ1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

L3-N5 (Lβ2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

L2-N4 (Lγ1)

 

 

 

 

0.0001

 

 

 

L1-N3 (Lγ3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60

70

80

90

100

 

 

20

30

40

50

 

 

 

 

 

Atomic number (Z)

 

 

 

 

c

1

M-shell weights of lines [relative to M5-N6,7 (Mα1,2) = 1]

 

 

 

 

 

lines

 

 

M5-N3 (Mζ)

 

 

M4-N6 (Mβ)

of

 

0.1

M3-N5 (Mγ)

 

M2-N4

weights

 

 

 

 

 

Relative

 

0.01

 

 

 

 

0.001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

 

 

 

 

Atomic number (Z)

 

 

 

4

46\ Chapter 4 · X-Rays

. Fig. 4.6  Ionization cross section for the silicon K-shell calculated with Eq. 4.4

. Fig. 4.7  Critical ionization energy for the K-, L-, and M-shells

K-shell ionization cross section of silicon

1.4e-20

1.2e-20

(cm2)

1.0e-20

sectioncross

8.0e-21

 

lonization

6.0e-21

4.0e-21

 

 

2.0e-21

 

0.0

 

0

 

5

10

 

15

 

20

 

25

30

 

 

 

 

 

Beam energy (keV)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Critical ionization energy of the elements

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

K-shell

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

L3 shell

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(keV)

 

M5 shell

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

energy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ionization

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Critical

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Atomic number (Z)

energy loss. The X-ray production in a thin foil of thickness t can be estimated from the cross section by calculating the effective density of atom targets within the foil:

n

photons / e

= Q

ionizations / e

(

atom / cm2

 

X

 

 

I

 

 

 

)

 

×ω [X-rays / ionization]× Ν 0

[atoms / mole]

 

 

(

)[

 

]

 

 

 

 

 

 

× 1/ A

 

moles / g

× ρ g / cm3

 

 

 

 

× t [cm] = QI ×ω × N0 × ρ × t / A

 

 

(4.7)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

\

where A is the atomic weight and N0 is Avogadro’s number.

When several elements are mixed at the atomic level in a thin specimen, the relative production of X-rays from different elements depends on the cross section and fluorescence yield, as given in Eq. 4.7, and also on the partitioning of the X-ray production among the various possible members of the X-ray families, as plotted in . Fig. 4.5a–c. The relative production for the most intense transition in each X-ray family is plotted in . Fig. 4.8 for E0 = 30 keV. . Figure 4.8 reveals